Quaternion-Based Local Frame Alignment between an Inertial Measurement Unit and a Motion Capture System

This paper presents a novel sensor-to-segment calibration procedure for inertial sensor-based knee joint kinematics analysis during cycling. This procedure was designed to be feasible in-field, autonomously, and without any external operator or device. It combines a static standing up posture and a pedaling task. The main goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the new sensor-to-segment calibration method (denoted as the ‘cycling’ method) by calculating errors in terms of body-segment orientations and 3D knee joint angles using inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based and optoelectronic-based motion capture. To do so, 14 participants were evaluated during pedaling motion at a workload of 100 W, which enabled comparisons of the cycling method with conventional calibration methods commonly employed in gait analysis. The accuracy of the cycling method was comparable to that of other methods concerning the knee flexion/extension angle, and did not exceed 3.8°. However, the cycling method presented the smallest errors for knee internal/external rotation (6.65 ± 1.94°) and abduction/adduction (5.92 ± 2.85°). This study demonstrated that a calibration method based on the completion of a pedaling task combined with a standing posture significantly improved the accuracy of 3D knee joint angle measurement when applied to cycling analysis.

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimation of 3D Knee Joint Angles during Cycling Using Inertial Sensors: Accuracy of a Novel Sensor-to-Segment Calibration Procedure Based on Pedaling Motion

Cordillet

Bideau

et al. 2019

“…Cuesta-Vargas et al [ 5 ] did an extensive literature review around works that “compare inertial sensors with any kind of gold standard”, indicating that “this gold standard has to be a tool for measuring human movement”. Lee and Jung [ 6 ] proposed a new method for local frame alignment between an IMU and a motion capture system, validating it with well-controlled experiments. Ricci et al [ 7 ] used a robotic arm and commercial IMUs to study movements related to “typical human dynamics”, and got errors of up to 10°, depending on the frequency, amplitude and orientation of the rotations.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 90%

Evaluation of Inertial Sensor Data by a Comparison with Optical Motion Capture Data of Guitar Strumming Gestures

Freire

Santos

Armondes

et al. 2020

Computing technologies have opened up a myriad of possibilities for expanding the sonic capabilities of acoustic musical instruments. Musicians nowadays employ a variety of rather inexpensive, wireless sensor-based systems to obtain refined control of interactive musical performances in actual musical situations like live music concerts. It is essential though to clearly understand the capabilities and limitations of such acquisition systems and their potential influence on high-level control of musical processes. In this study, we evaluate one such system composed of an inertial sensor (MetaMotionR) and a hexaphonic nylon guitar for capturing strumming gestures. To characterize this system, we compared it with a high-end commercial motion capture system (Qualisys) typically used in the controlled environments of research laboratories, in two complementary tasks: comparisons of rotational and translational data. For the rotations, we were able to compare our results with those that are found in the literature, obtaining RMSE below 10° for 88% of the curves. The translations were compared in two ways: by double derivation of positional data from the mocap and by double integration of IMU acceleration data. For the task of estimating displacements from acceleration data, we developed a compensative-integration method to deal with the oscillatory character of the strumming, whose approximative results are very dependent on the type of gestures and segmentation; a value of 0.77 was obtained for the average of the normalized covariance coefficients of the displacement magnitudes. Although not in the ideal range, these results point to a clearly acceptable trade-off between the flexibility, portability and low cost of the proposed system when compared to the limited use and cost of the high-end motion capture standard in interactive music setups.

“…However, the relative orientation between the actual coordinate system of the sensor and the local coordinate system of the rigid body obtained using the optical camera may increase the error when evaluating the accuracy of the orientation estimation. To align the two coordinate systems, the quaternion-based local frame alignment method proposed in [38] was used. The experiment was conducted by randomly shaking the sensor-attached rigid body by hand.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Data Augmentation on the Nine-Axis IMU-Based Orientation Estimation Accuracy of a Recurrent Neural Network

Choi,

Lee

2023

Self Cite

The nine-axis inertial and measurement unit (IMU)-based three-dimensional (3D) orientation estimation is a fundamental part of inertial motion capture. Recently, owing to the successful utilization of deep learning in various applications, orientation estimation neural networks (NNs) trained on large datasets, including nine-axis IMU signals and reference orientation data, have been developed. During the training process, the limited amount of training data is a critical issue in the development of powerful networks. Data augmentation, which increases the amount of training data, is a key approach for addressing the data shortage problem and thus for improving the estimation performance. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have been conducted to analyze the effects of data augmentation techniques on estimation performance in orientation estimation networks using IMU sensors. This paper selects three data augmentation techniques for IMU-based orientation estimation NNs, i.e., augmentation by virtual rotation, bias addition, and noise addition (which are hereafter referred to as rotation, bias, and noise, respectively). Then, this paper analyzes the effects of these augmentation techniques on estimation accuracy in recurrent neural networks, for a total of seven combinations (i.e., rotation only, bias only, noise only, rotation and bias, rotation and noise, and rotation and bias and noise). The evaluation results show that, among a total of seven augmentation cases, four cases including ‘rotation’ (i.e., rotation only, rotation and bias, rotation and noise, and rotation and bias and noise) occupy the top four. Therefore, it may be concluded that the augmentation effect of rotation is overwhelming compared to those of bias and noise. By applying rotation augmentation, the performance of the NN can be significantly improved. The analysis of the effect of the data augmentation techniques presented in this paper may provide insights for developing robust IMU-based orientation estimation networks.