2010
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-68212010000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

¿Qué Incentivos al Retiro Genera la Seguridad Social?: El Caso Uruguayo

Abstract: Unlike many OECD and Latin American countries, in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic stylised fact our model has to explain is why Uruguayan employees do not seem eager to retire as soon as they are eligible for public pensions, even when the implicit tax on continued work is comparatively high in Uruguay (Alvarez et al, 2012). The model can in principle explain this behaviour in two ways: either individuals are patient (low discount rate) or comparatively very risk-averse.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The basic stylised fact our model has to explain is why Uruguayan employees do not seem eager to retire as soon as they are eligible for public pensions, even when the implicit tax on continued work is comparatively high in Uruguay (Alvarez et al, 2012). The model can in principle explain this behaviour in two ways: either individuals are patient (low discount rate) or comparatively very risk-averse.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There has not been a similar decline in the retirement age of Uruguayan workers in the last two decades, with some increase in the case of women (Álvarez, da Silva, Forteza, & Rossi, 2010). In turn, in 1995 the parliament passed a law that changed several key parameters in the pay-as-you-go (PAYG) pillar and gradually introduced individual accounts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Workers earning the minimum wage have incentives to retire at age 60. However, as labor income increases,the slope is steeper and individuals have more incentives to retire at a later age 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%