Workers of the ant Formica truncorum specialize in rearing females or males depending on the number of fathers of a colony. These split sex ratios increase inclusive fitness, but it has remained unknown how workers assess the number of patrilines in their colonies and to what extent their reproductive decisions are constrained by lack of information. By analysis of the quantitative variation in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of workers of multiply mated queens, we show that the heritable component of recognition cues is low and that the extent of sex ratio biasing toward males is correlated with patriline differences in hydrocarbon profiles. Workers are thus able to capitalize on colony-level relatedness asymmetry, but their inclusive fitness is constrained by uninformative recognition cues. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the occasional expression of nepotistic phenotypes favoring full-sisters over half-sisters maintains selection against informative recognition cues. We evaluate how inclusive fitness theory may be used to predict the number and kind of recognition cues in insect societies of a specific relatedness structure.split sex ratios ͉ inclusive fitness ͉ chemical recognition ͉ cuticular hydrocarbons ͉ nepotism E very kin-structured society is a delicate balance between cooperation for common prosperity and potentially destructive conflicts between subgroups or individuals. The expression of such conflicts may increase the fitness of some individuals, but may entail collective costs when it disrupts social cohesion and reduces productivity (1). Principles of cooperation and conflict in families can generally be understood from Hamilton's rule (2), but the key variables in the equation (relatedness and the costs and benefits of helping), may both explain indiscriminate cooperation among relatives of any degree, and nepotistic discrimination between relatives of different relatedness. This paradox can only be resolved when recognition efficiency, i.e., the availability and perception of information on relatedness, is explicitly considered (3). Accurate information allows efficient recognition of individual degrees of kinship promoting the expression of conflict, whereas noisy recognition cues could make the cost of nepotism greater than the benefit and thus lead to unconditional cooperation among relatives, while still allowing discrimination of nonkin.The ability to differentiate between kin of different degree has been amply documented in vertebrate societies (4, 5), but has remained difficult to prove in insect societies (ref. 3, but see ref. 6). Likely reasons for this difference might be that insect colonies are larger than vertebrate societies, whereas the learning capacities of insects are limited compared with vertebrates (4). In addition, the social life of insects happens mostly in the darkness of nest cavities. Visual cues are therefore of limited use, the only known exception being paper wasps with daylight-exposed nests, which can recognize facial characteristics of nes...