2020
DOI: 10.2196/20547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QueerVIEW: Protocol for a Technology-Mediated Qualitative Photo Elicitation Study With Sexual and Gender Minority Youth in Ontario, Canada

Abstract: Background The experiences of resilience and intersectionality in the lives of contemporary sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) are important to explore. SGMY face unique experiences of discrimination in both online and offline environments, yet simultaneously build community and seek support in innovative ways. SGMY who identify as transgender, trans, or gender nonconforming and have experiences with child welfare, homelessness, or immigration have been particularly understudied. A qualitative… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QueerVIEW was a digital photo elicitation study utilizing constructivist grounded theory that was conducted in the province of Ontario, Canada from August 2019 to April 2020. QueerVIEW’s study protocol, including data collection tools, has been published elsewhere (Craig et al, 2020b ). The study was approved by the University of Toronto’s Health Science Research Ethics Board (Protocol #37041).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QueerVIEW was a digital photo elicitation study utilizing constructivist grounded theory that was conducted in the province of Ontario, Canada from August 2019 to April 2020. QueerVIEW’s study protocol, including data collection tools, has been published elsewhere (Craig et al, 2020b ). The study was approved by the University of Toronto’s Health Science Research Ethics Board (Protocol #37041).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That became especially clear in the COVID-19 pandemic when "more of our 'real lives' (including both our work and social engagements) are happening virtually" (Howlett, 2021, p. 9). These new windows to participants' lives help researchers explore the intersections of their identities, which can be meaningful (Craig et al, 2020).…”
Section: Identity Self Personas and Avatarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many times, researchers' personal lives and spaces are also exposed, implying they need now to think more carefully about how they want to be seen (Howlett, 2021). Additionally, technology increases participants' control over when and how researchers access the "field" (Howlett, 2021, p. 8) and over what they (participants) want to disclose (Craig et al, 2020). It is easier (and more socially acceptable) not answering a call than skipping an in-person interview.…”
Section: Participants' Agency and Power Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a multimodal analysis can be a way to uncover varied perceptions. For example, interpretations of emotions can be based on the format, so intercoder agreement may be better achieved by analyzing multiple formats of the same data source (Craig et al, 2020).…”
Section: Analysis Of Interviews With Marginalized Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, people may behave differently, or possibly be more reticent in fully participating compared to audio-recorded interviews (Brown, 2018). An ongoing consent process-wherein participants continue to share control over their image during the dissemination phase of the research project-can also help mitigate privacy concerns regarding video distribution (Craig et al, 2020).…”
Section: Audio and Video Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%