2007
DOI: 10.3917/cpc.028.0133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quel(s) espace(s) de parole(s) dans la maladie grave ?

Abstract: Résumé Cet article présente une réflexion sur les limites entre espace de recherche et espace d’accompagnement psychologique dans le contexte de la maladie grave. Ces questionnements sont apparus lors d’une recherche qualitative longitudinale et se fondent sur les demandes exprimées par les personnes en attente d’une greffe d’organe. Différents espaces de paroles ont été mentionnés (institutionnel, médical, familial). Tous sont importants, mais ils ne répondent pas aux besoins d’un espace protégé et non-évalua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice to disclose or not to disclose is context-dependent and related to the adequacy of the reactions of the person involved in the interaction (Figueiredo et al, 2004; Panagopoulou et al, 2002; Pennebaker, 1990; Piot-Ziegler et al, 2007). Differential consequences of emotion disclosure or non-disclosure on physiological and immunological reactions are not well understood yet, like the mechanisms underlying the effect of working through (or on) emotions (Solano et al, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice to disclose or not to disclose is context-dependent and related to the adequacy of the reactions of the person involved in the interaction (Figueiredo et al, 2004; Panagopoulou et al, 2002; Pennebaker, 1990; Piot-Ziegler et al, 2007). Differential consequences of emotion disclosure or non-disclosure on physiological and immunological reactions are not well understood yet, like the mechanisms underlying the effect of working through (or on) emotions (Solano et al, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical vulnerability and emotional vulnerability influence one another (Goetzmann et al, 2007), and the limit between what is bearable and the moment of rupture narrows. The pressure of being a good transplant candidate may also influence the positive personal characteristics present in the interviews (Piot-Ziegler et al, 2007, 2008). However, maintaining a positive identity and self-image and favouring positive or ‘neutralizing’ emotional-cognitive coping strategies are strengths or resources which are present in the interviews after registration on the waiting list.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indefinite period of waiting for the operation, feelings of impatience, discouragement and anxiety, including worries about the donor’s death, the graft’s engraftment and the necessary post-transplant medical regimen, create uncertainty and raise questions about the healing effect of the transplant ( 31 , 32 ). Communicating these concerns and uncertainties to members of the transplantation team is often hampered by patients’ fears that such discussions will affect their eligibility for transplantation ( 33 ).…”
Section: Pancreas Transplantation and Psychological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%