2013
DOI: 10.13182/nt13-a15768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quenching Experiments: Coolability of Debris Bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both top and bottom flooding were investigated in POMECO and DEBRIS with volumetric induction heating, which required a number of technical innovations to ensure a near-to-uniform temperature profile across the debris bed diameter. DEBRIS analytical tests (Kulkarni et al, 2010;Rashid et al, 2011) complement the PEARL experiments by including top and side water injection and considering irregular shape particles (representative of TMI-2 debris), higher pressures and temperatures. In the DEBRIS tests with irregular particle sizes (steel screws 3 mm head diameter × 10 mm length, and steel cylinders 3 × 5.75 mm), the quenching behaviour showed pronounced multi-dimensional features.…”
Section: Formation and Cooling Of Debris Bedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both top and bottom flooding were investigated in POMECO and DEBRIS with volumetric induction heating, which required a number of technical innovations to ensure a near-to-uniform temperature profile across the debris bed diameter. DEBRIS analytical tests (Kulkarni et al, 2010;Rashid et al, 2011) complement the PEARL experiments by including top and side water injection and considering irregular shape particles (representative of TMI-2 debris), higher pressures and temperatures. In the DEBRIS tests with irregular particle sizes (steel screws 3 mm head diameter × 10 mm length, and steel cylinders 3 × 5.75 mm), the quenching behaviour showed pronounced multi-dimensional features.…”
Section: Formation and Cooling Of Debris Bedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of data on degraded core reflooding indicates that major gaps in knowledge till remain in the areas of debris and molten pool. To address these issues, POMECO (KTH) [4] and DEBRIS (IKE) [5] analytical experiments with debris beds are performed to support the quantification of basic laws and coolability behaviour. Top and bottom flooding (quenching) of hot debris (up to 900 • C) can be investigated in the DEBRIS facility, also at elevated pressures.…”
Section: Corium and Debris Coolabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For higher bed porosity compositions (38% porosity, mean particle size 1 mm), the gas injection led to increased quenching times even though the countercurrent flow limitation was not reached [6]. In previous studies at the IKE's test facility DEBRIS (diameter/ height of test section 150/600 mm), quenching experiments were carried out by Sch€ afer and Groll [8] and Rashid et al [9] for topand bottom-flooding configurations with various initial particle bed temperatures and various particle bed configurations (monoand polydispersed beds) focusing mainly on the phenomenology of quenching. In further studies, various downcomer configurations (closed, open, perforated) and the influence of higher system pressure were investigated by Leininger et al [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%