1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)01460-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quenching of 7‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzo‐2‐oxa‐1,3‐diazole‐modified Na+/K+‐ATPase reveals a higher accessibility of the low‐affinity ATP‐binding site

Abstract: 7-Chloro-4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-l,3-diazole (NBD-C1) labeled Na + /K + -ATPase covalently with two different inactivation constants (AT; = 2.5 IJM; K' = 10 \iM). It apparently modified the two different ATP-binding sites of the enzyme since it decreased the activity of the E 2 ATP site, i.e. the Inactivated para-nitrophenylphosphatase activity, in an enzyme whose high-affinity EiATP site had been blocked by fluorescein 5'isothiocyanate (FITC). It also reduced the activity of the Ei ATP site, i.e. the Na + -activat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is surprising, therefore, that FITC is a label of the E 1 ATP site and not of the E 2 ATP site, whereas ErITC binds to and modifies both ATP sites. The idea has been put forward more recently that the E 2 ATP site has a broader binding pocket than the E 1 ATP site, since after modification of the E 2 ATP site with 7-chloro-4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole chloride, the latter site was easily accessible to a number of fluorescence quenchers (54). This explanation, however, cannot be applied to the differential labeling of ATP sites by ErITC and FITC, since the more bulky ErITC should not bind to the E 1 ATP site, which is what actually happens (Table I).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is surprising, therefore, that FITC is a label of the E 1 ATP site and not of the E 2 ATP site, whereas ErITC binds to and modifies both ATP sites. The idea has been put forward more recently that the E 2 ATP site has a broader binding pocket than the E 1 ATP site, since after modification of the E 2 ATP site with 7-chloro-4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole chloride, the latter site was easily accessible to a number of fluorescence quenchers (54). This explanation, however, cannot be applied to the differential labeling of ATP sites by ErITC and FITC, since the more bulky ErITC should not bind to the E 1 ATP site, which is what actually happens (Table I).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external quencher KI (15) has limited access to the fluorophores attached to the ODN in the lipid-coated particles. Thus, the lipid-coated particles should show less quenching than the free ODN or naked polyplexes.…”
Section: Protection Of Odn From Ki Quenchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the last centrifugation step, the protein was resuspended in 0.3 ml of 20 mM Tris‐HCl buffer of pH 7.25 (final concentration 1.8 mg/ml). The partial activities and specificity of the labeled compounds were measured as described previously [2, 3, 11, 19]. Notably, 5′‐isothiocyanates like FITC or ErITC are reportedly potent labels of both Cys and Lys residues at pH 7.25 [20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%