2005
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392005000400018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quenching technology: a selected overview of the current state-of-the-art

Abstract: Many papers have been published on a wide range of aspects of the fundamental physics and chemistry of quenching such as: additive technology, surface rewetting, hardness distribution prediction, role of heat transfer and residual stresses, etc.1,2. However, relatively little information has been published on the application of these insightful research results for the solution of long standing quench tank production problems. This paper will address three areas where technical advancements have been, or may b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the differentiating results at various monitoring locations, we conclude that our model has been able to accommodate the quench rate fluctuations introduced by variations in the dipping orientation [3][4][5], although some inconsistencies remain in modeling their dynamics in the numerical model. Particularly, detailed physical effects of orientation of the quenching surface, surface roughness, bubble nucleation on the heat flux modification [7] have not been taken into consideration in the current form of the model.…”
Section: Quenching With C2 Type Orientationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From the differentiating results at various monitoring locations, we conclude that our model has been able to accommodate the quench rate fluctuations introduced by variations in the dipping orientation [3][4][5], although some inconsistencies remain in modeling their dynamics in the numerical model. Particularly, detailed physical effects of orientation of the quenching surface, surface roughness, bubble nucleation on the heat flux modification [7] have not been taken into consideration in the current form of the model.…”
Section: Quenching With C2 Type Orientationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, it is to be noted that transient heat flux is significantly fluctuating in comparison to the steady state heat flux [3,[34][35][36] …”
Section: Transition Boiling Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations