Querulous Citizens: Welfare Knowledge and the Limits to Welfare Reform

Abstract

Governments face pressures to improve services and (at the same time) to contain taxes and to ensure that their decisions are accountable to increasingly well-informed and challenging citizens. The dilemma of "squaring the welfare circle" confronts New Labour in a particularly acute form, since the party has set ambitious targets for improvements in the NHS, education and elsewhere, and is also committed to economic prudence and transparency. This article uses new data from a major national survey to investigate knowledge and beliefs in the main policy areas. It shows that most people are generally strikingly well-informed in some areas and ill-informed in others. A government which wishes to pursue a progressive direction in redistribution, increasing taxation of the better-off, or expanding provision for those on low incomes, faces real difficulties because many people hold inaccurate beliefs about policy impact and the policy context in these areas. However, NHS costs are more accurately perceived across the population, and the proposed expansion is likely to create less controversy. Current high-profile policies appear to follow the contours of public knowledge reasonably accurately, but further policy development will require positive efforts to lead debates and improve public knowledge. The Need to Explain Policy Choices to CitizensFor reasons beyond their control, to do with economic globalization, changes in labour markets and shifts in population structure, governments in welfare states face increasing pressure on public spending. These constraints are growing stricter at a time when commentators detect an increasingly querulous and challenging stance among citizens. The New Labour government in the UK faces particular problems. It comes from a political tradition that

Coupling Social Solidarity and Social Harmony in Hong Kong

“…This finding reflects the discrepancy of beliefs and values or class interest and consciousness in general among classes (Marsh 2003;Marshall et al 1988). However, class or income tends to generate a negative effect on social harmony in some instances, such as on trust, cooperation, support for economic redistribution, public spending, and social inclusion (Houtman 2000;Link and Oldendick 1999;Kluegal and Bobo 2001;Pescosolido et al 2001;Silverstein and Parrott 2001;Taylor-Gooby et al 2003;Wilson 2001). Meanwhile, class or income is conducive to some aspects of social harmony, including conformity, helping, charity, donation, and gift giving (Bekkers 2008;Chen 2006;Foster et al 2001;Godoy et al 2007;Ulbig 2002).…”

Improving Service Delivery through State–Citizen Partnership: The Case of theAhmedabad Urban Transport System

“…Contrary to public choice theory, where the citizens are viewed to be making choices following their self‐interest, according to Sandel (), the notion of democratic citizenship implies that the citizens go beyond their own interests to focus on matters that can bring about a larger public good. Citizens in deliberative spheres demand “a more dialogic democracy, in which government, to retain its legitimacy, must win an active trust rather than simply presuming a habitual loyalty” (Taylor‐Gooby, Hastie, and Bromley :2).…”

Factors Affecting Adherence to Governmental Health Warnings and the Case of Over-the-Counter Cough and Cold Medications (OTC-CCM) in Children Under Two

“…The challenges of creating effective health communications faced by the FDA may be unique to the USA and not representative of those relevant to similar health organizations in other countries. Indeed low trust of the FDA may be attributable to its recent approval and subsequent removal of another drug for chronic pain (Harris 2005 ) or low public satisfaction with healthcare reform (Taylor-Gooby 2006 ;Taylor-Gooby and Bromley 2003 ). Warnings about OTC-CCM usage are a prime case study for comparing similar warnings across countries.…”