2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2010.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Query performance evaluation of an architecture for fine-grained integration of heterogeneous grid data sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing number of distributed, autonomous and heterogeneous data sources, (ie: XML documents, relational database and HTML pages among others), has motivated the need for data integration systems, allowing users to query those sources transparently (Roth and Skritek., 2013;Pires et al, 2012). In this sense, dynamic data integration systems, as Peer Data Management Systems (PDMS) (Halevy et al, 2006), Grid (Zamboulis et al, 2010) or systems based on a pay-as-you-go strategy (Halevy et al, 2008), have been used to improve the data sharing of data sources distributed on the Web or on the cloud (Wall and Angryk, 2011). Some of these systems have a dynamic behaviour, i.e., their data sources have autonomy to join/leave the system and to change their own schemas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing number of distributed, autonomous and heterogeneous data sources, (ie: XML documents, relational database and HTML pages among others), has motivated the need for data integration systems, allowing users to query those sources transparently (Roth and Skritek., 2013;Pires et al, 2012). In this sense, dynamic data integration systems, as Peer Data Management Systems (PDMS) (Halevy et al, 2006), Grid (Zamboulis et al, 2010) or systems based on a pay-as-you-go strategy (Halevy et al, 2008), have been used to improve the data sharing of data sources distributed on the Web or on the cloud (Wall and Angryk, 2011). Some of these systems have a dynamic behaviour, i.e., their data sources have autonomy to join/leave the system and to change their own schemas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%