2006
DOI: 10.1007/11821069_59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Querying and Embedding Compressed Texts

Abstract: Abstract. In this work the computational complexity of two simple string problems on compressed input strings is considered: the querying problem (What is the symbol at a given position in a given input string?) and the embedding problem (Can the first input string embedded into the second input string?). Straightline programs are used for text compression. It is shown that the querying problem becomes P-complete for compressed strings, while the embedding problem becomes hard for the complexity class Θ p 2 .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LCS problem on two GC-strings has been considered by Lifshits and Lohrey [45,46], and proven to be PP-hard (and therefore NP-hard).…”
Section: Compressed String Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LCS problem on two GC-strings has been considered by Lifshits and Lohrey [45,46], and proven to be PP-hard (and therefore NP-hard).…”
Section: Compressed String Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LCS problem on a pair of GC-strings has been considered by Lifshits and Lohrey [80], and proven to be NP-hard.…”
Section: Three-way Semi-local Lcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This running time should be contrasted with standard LCS algorithms on plain strings, running in time O mn log(m+n) [84,34], and with the NP-hardness of the LCS problem on two GC-strings [80].…”
Section: Algorithm 8 (Three-way Semi-local Lcs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Define the word W as in (12). Finally, we describe an alternating HFA A that accepts the word W if and only if (V, E, v ξ , F, β) is a positive AGAP-instance.…”
Section: Compressed Membership Problems For Hierarchical Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the language (13) and the word W from (12). First, we can replace every occurrence of a * by a {∪, ·}-expression µ for {ε} ∪ ran(code), where ran(code) is the (finite) range of the mapping code.…”
Section: Point (A) Is Easy To See: For the Only If-direction One Showmentioning
confidence: 99%