2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/801/1/012077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Question analysis for Indonesian comparative question

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental setting is still the same as [20], but we used the data described in Section 2-A -2-C. From the preliminary experiment, it is found that the information extraction first scenario is better than question classification first. For the information extraction process, we do token classification with these features: the word lexical, 2 words before and after, and the previous label.…”
Section: E Preliminary Results On Question Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental setting is still the same as [20], but we used the data described in Section 2-A -2-C. From the preliminary experiment, it is found that the information extraction first scenario is better than question classification first. For the information extraction process, we do token classification with these features: the word lexical, 2 words before and after, and the previous label.…”
Section: E Preliminary Results On Question Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collect 477 comparative question for training and testing data, including 150 question from our previous work [20]. Some of the questions from the previous work are not used because it is still ambiguous whether the questions are comparative or not.…”
Section: Overview On Data and Question Analysis A Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some works on mining comparative opinion have been performed in other languages, such as Chinese [26][27][28][29], Korean [30,31], Vietnamese [32] and Indonesian [33].…”
Section: Comparative Opinion Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%