Because many studies of question answering, recall, and recognition have examined script-based messages, a spurious link between answering strategy and searched representation has emerged: Direct retrieval has been associated with the episodic representation of a discourse or a learned list, whereas plausibility judgment has been associated with general knowledge structures. Evidence of the independence of answering strategy and searched representation is presented. First, previous research and intuition both provide examples of the application of either strategy to either type of representation. Second, there is empirical evidence of the application of either strategy to both message text bases and general knowledge. Third, the effects offactors influencing strategy selection are independent of the type of searched representation. It is concluded that answering strategy is independent of the representation to which it is applied.The study of the psychology of question answering has resulted in the identification of different answering strategies. In particular, it is possible either to directly retrieve a questioned idea from memory or to answer by evaluating the plausibility of the questioned idea (e.g., Reder, 1982Reder, , 1987. The goal of this paper is to present evidence that question-answering strategy is independent of the type of knowledge structure to which the strategy is applied. For convenience, the target knowledge structure will be called the searched representation. It will be argued that, although the independence of answering strategy and searched representation is implicit in the psychological literature on question answering and sentence verification, the distinction between these dimensions has not been clearly drawn.The paper will be structured as follows: First, the current status of the analysis of answering strategies will be briefly reviewed. A potential confounding between answering strategy and searched representation is considered. Next, some studies that have not confounded these two dimensions but have also not clearly distinguished them will be examined. Finally, the theoretical implications of the distinction between these two dimensions of question answering will be considered.
Question-Answering StrategiesThe cognition of question answering has been carefully scrutinized during the past 15 years. The ability to answer questions about text has been identified as an essential criterion of comprehension, more important than successful paraphrasing or summarization (Lehnert, 1977).