2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33783-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Question-Based Spatial Computing—A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The improvement of the workflow development process has been researched from various perspectives; including the translation of spatial questions into operations [28], semantic descriptions of spatial data in order to define which operations can be sensibly applied to the data [7,11], ontologies of domain knowledge that support the automated translation of a user task into operations [6], extended descriptions of geoprocessing operations [12,13,29], and verification of workflows before execution [14,30]. These approaches are discussed in the following section; extended operation descriptions are discussed in more detail in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Improved Workflow Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement of the workflow development process has been researched from various perspectives; including the translation of spatial questions into operations [28], semantic descriptions of spatial data in order to define which operations can be sensibly applied to the data [7,11], ontologies of domain knowledge that support the automated translation of a user task into operations [6], extended descriptions of geoprocessing operations [12,13,29], and verification of workflows before execution [14,30]. These approaches are discussed in the following section; extended operation descriptions are discussed in more detail in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Improved Workflow Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Kuhn ( : 2267 notes, it is essential to rethink the fundamentals of spatial information while promoting clarity that cuts across technical boundaries and broadens spatial literacy for nonexperts. Contributing to the work by Kuhn and Ballatore (2015: 219) and Vahedi et al (2016) to design an intuitive GIS language for question-driven spatial studies, we focus on bridging the gaps between data discovery and spatial analysis tools by broadening the spectrum of exploitable spatial data sources. Compared to the vast amount of implicit spatial data (hidden location attributes often in the form of metadata, auxiliary place names, and geotagged attributes (Heinzle and Sester 2003: 335)), there remains a relatively limited quantity of online explicit spatial data (georeferenced geometry-based features (Brisaboa et al 2011: 358)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Kuhn (2012Kuhn ( : 2267 notes, it is essential to rethink the fundamentals of spatial information while promoting clarity that cuts across technical boundaries and broadens spatial literacy for nonexperts. Contributing to the work by Kuhn and Ballatore (2015: 219) and Vahedi et al (2016) to design an intuitive GIS language for question-driven spatial studies, we focus on bridging the gaps between data discovery and spatial analysis tools by broadening the spectrum of exploitable spatial data sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When available, explicit data are typically served from a limited number of administrative portals or require intensive energy and time from a user searching, exporting, encoding and cleaning before being usable (Munson 2013: 65). These preprocessing requirements limit the feasibility of question-driven spatial analysis (Vahedi et al 2016) and force domain scientists to base their studies on data availability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%