2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2010.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Question classification based on co-training style semi-supervised learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[32] et al proposed combining part of speech, bag of words and syntactic dependency tree on the basis of SVM, and analyzed the structure of the problem by calculating the value of its kernel function. For the classification of Chinese problems, Yu [33] et al used high-frequency words as features, and trained classifiers on the labeled and unlabeled data sets through a collaborative training algorithm, and achieved 88.9% and 78.2% in the classification of large and small problems respectively. Zhang [34] and others made full use of the syntax structure of the problem, using the bag-of-words model and the kernel function based on the problem grammar tree to train SVM, and also got a higher classification accuracy.…”
Section: Problem Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32] et al proposed combining part of speech, bag of words and syntactic dependency tree on the basis of SVM, and analyzed the structure of the problem by calculating the value of its kernel function. For the classification of Chinese problems, Yu [33] et al used high-frequency words as features, and trained classifiers on the labeled and unlabeled data sets through a collaborative training algorithm, and achieved 88.9% and 78.2% in the classification of large and small problems respectively. Zhang [34] and others made full use of the syntax structure of the problem, using the bag-of-words model and the kernel function based on the problem grammar tree to train SVM, and also got a higher classification accuracy.…”
Section: Problem Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A_MBWB features and T_MBWB features prove to be very informative for Chinese question classification, and can further boost the question classification accuracy. Table 6 shows the accuracy compared with previous research work for Chinese question classification, including (Wen, 2006), (Sun, 2007), (Zhang, 2009), (Yu, 2010), (Yang, 2013).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Chinese question classification [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], lexical semantic features and structural features are the guarantees of high performance of question classification. However, due to the fact that the current Chinese NLP technology is not as mature as the English NLP technology, compared with English question classification, it's quite difficult to extract more effect features for Chinese question classification, and as a result, the accuracy of Chinese question classification is much lower than that of English question classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer type taxonomy can be built semi-automatically or by hand, for example, from WordNet (Ray et al 2010;Jochen and Leidner 2004). Many supervised and semi-supervised machine learning algorithm, such as SVMNB, decision tree, co-training, are applied to classifying the questions (Li and Roth 2002;Huang et al 2008;Yu et al 2010;Zhang 2003). The typical features used in a classifier include: the words in the questions, the POS tags of each word and the named entities in the questions.…”
Section: Understanding Of User Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%