Abstract:Objectives. Crosshatching incision has been considered a useful method for correcting cartilaginous septal deviation. The aim of this study was to determine the utility and limitations of this approach.Methods. This retrospective case-control study included 353 patients who underwent septoplasty performed by a senior surgeon between January 2004 and December 2010. Patients were classified into two groups according to whether crosshatching incision was performed (n=151) during septoplasty or not (n=202). All ot… Show more
“…In general, deviation of the L‐strut of the nasal septum is more challenging to correct than the middle and has less favorable results 2 . There are various techniques to correct the L‐strut, but there is no clear choice 3‐15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the L‐strut curvature remains, the nasal valve narrowing is not resolved. A simple cross‐hatching incision weakens the L‐struts support and may result in even more deviation 4 . Batten graft for straightening the caudal septum is useful but may make it too broad or worsen dorsal septal deviation 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 There are various techniques to correct the L‐strut, but there is no clear choice. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 …”
Objectives
In general, deviation of the L‐strut of the nasal septum is more challenging to correct than the middle and has less favorable results. This study aimed to develop a technique to correct the L‐strut while preserving nasal support effectively and introduce the L‐septoplasty technique and its effects.
Methods
Patients with caudal and high dorsal septal deviations who underwent the L‐septoplasty technique were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and three‐month postoperative comparative assessments included the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and minimal cross‐sectional area (MCA).
Results
Thirty patients seen at a tertiary care center were included. NOSE scale scores improved from 47.2 to 13.6, which was statistically significant (P < .001). MCA increased from 0.43 cm2 to 0.74 cm2 (P < .001). During the 3‐month follow‐up period, deviation correction was well maintained in all patients, and no surgical complications, such as saddle nose deformity, occurred.
Conclusion
The L‐septoplasty technique is effective in simultaneously correcting caudal and high dorsal septal deviations without any complications.
Level of evidence
4.
“…In general, deviation of the L‐strut of the nasal septum is more challenging to correct than the middle and has less favorable results 2 . There are various techniques to correct the L‐strut, but there is no clear choice 3‐15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the L‐strut curvature remains, the nasal valve narrowing is not resolved. A simple cross‐hatching incision weakens the L‐struts support and may result in even more deviation 4 . Batten graft for straightening the caudal septum is useful but may make it too broad or worsen dorsal septal deviation 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 There are various techniques to correct the L‐strut, but there is no clear choice. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 …”
Objectives
In general, deviation of the L‐strut of the nasal septum is more challenging to correct than the middle and has less favorable results. This study aimed to develop a technique to correct the L‐strut while preserving nasal support effectively and introduce the L‐septoplasty technique and its effects.
Methods
Patients with caudal and high dorsal septal deviations who underwent the L‐septoplasty technique were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and three‐month postoperative comparative assessments included the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and minimal cross‐sectional area (MCA).
Results
Thirty patients seen at a tertiary care center were included. NOSE scale scores improved from 47.2 to 13.6, which was statistically significant (P < .001). MCA increased from 0.43 cm2 to 0.74 cm2 (P < .001). During the 3‐month follow‐up period, deviation correction was well maintained in all patients, and no surgical complications, such as saddle nose deformity, occurred.
Conclusion
The L‐septoplasty technique is effective in simultaneously correcting caudal and high dorsal septal deviations without any complications.
Level of evidence
4.
“…Septoplasty is the surgical correction of the deviated or deformed nasal septum, the first examples of which date back to ancient Egypt (7). Nowadays, a variety of techniques are performed by surgeons in septoplasty operations; the types of nasal septal deviation (NSD) and surgeon's preferences are important to decide which technique to be applied (8,9). Cottle's septoplasty with a hemitransfixion incision is one of the most frequently used techniques in the world (9).…”
Objective: Aim of the study is to evaluate the subjective outcomes and objective outcomes postoperatively and investigate correlations between these measurements. Material and Methods: This prospective before and after surgical study was conducted with patients admitted with symptomatic nasal septum deviation (NSD) and who underwent Cottle's septoplasty. Morphometric diameters of the nasal cavity were measured using a multi-detector computed tomography. Preoperative and postoperative one-month Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale (NOSE) score, acoustic rhinometry (AR), and anterior active rhinomanometry (AAR) measurements were used to evaluate the success of surgery. The correlations between these measurements were also evaluated.
Results:The study population consisted of 30 patients, including 19 males and 11 females, with a median age of 27.5 years. There was a statistically significant difference between pre and postoperative NOSE scores, with a mean difference of 53.17 points (p<0.001). There were statistically significant differences between pre and postoperative AR parameters of both the deviated side (DS) and non-deviated side (NDS) of the nose both before and after decongestion. There were statistically significant improvements in all postoperative airflow and airway resistance parameters of the DS of the nose before decongestion when compared to preoperative measurements. There were moderate to large positive correlations between morphometric diameters and differences in NOSE score. Further, there were several statistically significant correlations between differences in AR and AAR measurements and differences in NOSE score. Conclusion: Our findings showed that the objective measurements are strongly correlated with the NOSE score.
“…The primary drawbacks of the crosshatching incision are the unpredictability of straightening the curved cartilage and the potential for a weakening of the septum over time. In an issue of Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, Kim and Heo [4] compared their experience of crosshatching incision septoplasty with non-incision septoplasty. They reviewed 151 patients who underwent septoplasty using crosshatching incision and 202 patients who did not.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.