2013
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questionable levels of evidence in new atrial fibrillation guidelines? Reply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
14

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
72
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…6,22 Guidelines reflect this uncertainty and either do not mention patients with ESRD or make no recommendation. [24][25][26] There is unease about using vitamin K antagonists in ESRD not only because of the increased risk of bleeding but also the association with vascular calcification inducing cardiovascular disease or calciphylaxis. 27,28 Unfortunately, no suitable alternative currently exists.…”
Section: Anticoagulation In Esrdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,22 Guidelines reflect this uncertainty and either do not mention patients with ESRD or make no recommendation. [24][25][26] There is unease about using vitamin K antagonists in ESRD not only because of the increased risk of bleeding but also the association with vascular calcification inducing cardiovascular disease or calciphylaxis. 27,28 Unfortunately, no suitable alternative currently exists.…”
Section: Anticoagulation In Esrdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In non-anticoagulated patients the periprocedure risk of ischemic event associated with ECV is between 5 and 7%, but warfarin treatment reduces the incidence of thromboembolic events between 0.5 and 1.6% [6]. International guidelines recommend at least 3 consecutive weeks of effective anticoagulation prior to cardioversion, followed by at least another 4 weeks of anticoagulation thereafter [5,7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients received anticoagulant treatment before ECV for at least 3 weeks, as indicated by clinical practice guidelines [5]. The choice of the type of anticoagulant treatment was decided by the responsible physician before the patient was referred to the Arrhythmia Unit for ECV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence tends to increase with aging from 0.5% in 40-50 year old patients till 5-17% in 80-85 year old patients (Camm et al, 2012;European Heart Rhythm et al, 2010;Go et al, 2001;Stewart, Hart, Hole, & McMurray, 2001). The possibility of developing AF at the age of 55 in the European population is 23.8% for men and 22.2% for women (Heeringa et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the male patients with CHA2DS2-VASc a score of one, the benefit of oral anticoagulants must be compared with possible bleeding risk as assessed by the HAS-BLED score, with oral anticoagulants prescribed where the stroke risk outweighs the risk of bleeding. Stroke and bleeding risks should be re-evaluated at least once a year, coinciding with change of age category new hypertension, and certain other categories (Camm et al, 2012;Hobbs et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%