2015
DOI: 10.1080/1350293x.2015.1043814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questioning methodologies in research on men in ECEC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reporting of unfavourable attitudes towards male ECEC colleagues may be subject to social desirability biases, given that such attitudes run counter to recent social advocacy for men in ECEC (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2019), workplace rules (Thorpe et al, 2018) and common interpersonal etiquette (Tourangeau et al, 2019). In the context of a face-to-face interview about men’s place in ECEC, it is possible that female educators may mask any reticence in order to protect themselves from potential judgements (Pruit, 2015; Rohrmann and Brody, 2015). In other contexts, interviewees have been found to voice their own beliefs as the perspectives of others in order to avoid judgement (Maio and Augoustinos, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reporting of unfavourable attitudes towards male ECEC colleagues may be subject to social desirability biases, given that such attitudes run counter to recent social advocacy for men in ECEC (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2019), workplace rules (Thorpe et al, 2018) and common interpersonal etiquette (Tourangeau et al, 2019). In the context of a face-to-face interview about men’s place in ECEC, it is possible that female educators may mask any reticence in order to protect themselves from potential judgements (Pruit, 2015; Rohrmann and Brody, 2015). In other contexts, interviewees have been found to voice their own beliefs as the perspectives of others in order to avoid judgement (Maio and Augoustinos, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example Rohrmann and Brody, (2015) are critical of empirical gender research that does not include explicit self-reflection on gender bias. The research team who undertook this study included one female researcher (the author) and one male researcher.…”
Section: Methodology In the Case Study Of Acorns Nurserymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, with the disappointing progress of government initiatives to encourage men's participation in ECEC in Western societies, researchers are reexamining why men are still scarce in this sector (Peeters 2013;Peeters, Rohrmann, and Emilsen 2015). Second, Rohrmann and Brody (2015) reviewed the methodologies used in research on men in ECEC, noting methodological variability including contradictory findings about men's contributions to ECEC. Three, scholarly literature about the importance of including men in ECEC has continued to flourish, and the inclusion of a particular focus on cultural discourses is applauded (Brody 2014;Brownhill 2015;Peeters, Rohrmann, and Emilsen 2015;Rohrmann and Emilsen 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%