Abstract:It is shown that a class of exponentially decaying time-of-arrival probability distributions suggested by Włodarz, Marchewka and Schuss, and Jurman and Nikolić, as well as a semiclassical distribution implicit in timeof-flight momentum measurements, do not show the expected behavior for a Gaussian wave train. This casts doubts on the physical adequacy of these arrival-time proposals. In contrast, the quantum flux distribution (a special case of the Bohmian arrival-time distribution) displays the expected behav… Show more
“…The TOA probability distribution of Eq. ( 8) can also be derived in the framework of Bohmian mechanics [2,3,29]. In [2] the authors discuss the existence of free particle states with definite momentum sign for which the probabilistic interpretation of the quantum flux is still forbidden.…”
Section: B the Quantum Flux Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with Ψ(p) the components of the Fourier transform of Ψ(x, 0) and L the distance between the source of the wave and the detector [2,3]. Due to the nature of this definition, Eq.…”
Section: The Semiclassical Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We denote x k and p k respectively the mean position and momentum of the k-th Gaussian wave packet. An analysis similar to [3] revealed that all the TOA proposals are well-behaved for a Gaussian train that satisfies a no-spreading condition, namely when quantum diffusion is negligible and the propagation of each packet is approximately a rigid translation. In this regime, each TOA distribution yields an equiprobable sequence of peaks centred around the classical TOA |x k m/p k | [37].…”
Section: B Gaussian Wave Train and Time Of Arrival Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We explore different regimes (see Fig. 1) where we can compare the Kijowski axiomatic construction [7] (which is in agreement with [4][5][6]), the quantum flux approach [3,8] and the quantum clock proposal [19,20]. Our analysis is not limited to predicting a specific experimental result but it highlights those regimes in which different theoretical approaches lead to contradicting predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In experiments the TOA is usually computed using the semiclassical approximation [2], which holds only in regimes where quantum effects can be neglected, i.e. if the particle is approximated by a well localized wave packet with negligible spatial uncertainty compared to the detector dimension [3]. Due to the limited validity of this approach, several quantum time and quantum TOA formulations have been proposed.…”
We compare the different proposals that have appeared in the literature to describe a measurement of the time of arrival of a quantum particle at a detector. We show that there are multiple regimes where different proposals give inequivalent, experimentally discriminable, predictions. This analysis paves the way for future experimental tests.
“…The TOA probability distribution of Eq. ( 8) can also be derived in the framework of Bohmian mechanics [2,3,29]. In [2] the authors discuss the existence of free particle states with definite momentum sign for which the probabilistic interpretation of the quantum flux is still forbidden.…”
Section: B the Quantum Flux Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with Ψ(p) the components of the Fourier transform of Ψ(x, 0) and L the distance between the source of the wave and the detector [2,3]. Due to the nature of this definition, Eq.…”
Section: The Semiclassical Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We denote x k and p k respectively the mean position and momentum of the k-th Gaussian wave packet. An analysis similar to [3] revealed that all the TOA proposals are well-behaved for a Gaussian train that satisfies a no-spreading condition, namely when quantum diffusion is negligible and the propagation of each packet is approximately a rigid translation. In this regime, each TOA distribution yields an equiprobable sequence of peaks centred around the classical TOA |x k m/p k | [37].…”
Section: B Gaussian Wave Train and Time Of Arrival Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We explore different regimes (see Fig. 1) where we can compare the Kijowski axiomatic construction [7] (which is in agreement with [4][5][6]), the quantum flux approach [3,8] and the quantum clock proposal [19,20]. Our analysis is not limited to predicting a specific experimental result but it highlights those regimes in which different theoretical approaches lead to contradicting predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In experiments the TOA is usually computed using the semiclassical approximation [2], which holds only in regimes where quantum effects can be neglected, i.e. if the particle is approximated by a well localized wave packet with negligible spatial uncertainty compared to the detector dimension [3]. Due to the limited validity of this approach, several quantum time and quantum TOA formulations have been proposed.…”
We compare the different proposals that have appeared in the literature to describe a measurement of the time of arrival of a quantum particle at a detector. We show that there are multiple regimes where different proposals give inequivalent, experimentally discriminable, predictions. This analysis paves the way for future experimental tests.
Bohmian mechanics grounds the predictions of quantum mechanics in precise dynamical laws for a primitive ontology of point particles. In an appraisal of the de-Broglie-Bohm theory, the paper discusses the crucial epistemological and conceptual role that a primitive ontology plays within a physical theory. It argues that quantum theories without primitive ontology fail to make contact with observable reality in a clear and consistent manner. Finally, it discusses Einstein's epistemological model and why it supports the primitive ontology approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.