DOI: 10.33540/1185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questioning the Conversion Paradox

Abstract: A note on languageAll recorded interviews and informal conversations were conducted in Dutch, transcribed (in the case of interviews), and translated into English. Throughout this dissertation, Hebrew, Yiddish, and Arabic terminology is italicised and provided in its English phonetic spelling.The meaning of such terms is provided upon the first instance, whilst a full glossary is provided in appendix A for terms that appear more than once. Jewish interlocutors used both Hebrew and Yiddish words and, in these i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cumulatively, this study has challenged the assumption that conversion means moving from one (secular) sphere of life to another (religious) sphere, and it has highlighted the specific role of gender and sexuality in the construction of the religion/secular divide. The comparative analyses also problematised scholarly, public and political views in which liberal-secular society and conservative religious communities are seen as opposed on the basis of gender and sexuality (Beekers and Schrijvers 2020;Schrijvers 2021Schrijvers , 2022.…”
Section: Nwo Programme "Beyond 'Religion Versus Emancipation': Women'...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cumulatively, this study has challenged the assumption that conversion means moving from one (secular) sphere of life to another (religious) sphere, and it has highlighted the specific role of gender and sexuality in the construction of the religion/secular divide. The comparative analyses also problematised scholarly, public and political views in which liberal-secular society and conservative religious communities are seen as opposed on the basis of gender and sexuality (Beekers and Schrijvers 2020;Schrijvers 2021Schrijvers , 2022.…”
Section: Nwo Programme "Beyond 'Religion Versus Emancipation': Women'...mentioning
confidence: 99%