2010
DOI: 10.1037/a0019965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questioning the model minority: Studies of Asian American academic performance.

Abstract: The current paper reviews literature on the academic performance of Asian Americans with a critical eye toward understanding the influence of discrimination on this process. Specifically, this study seeks to understand the extent to which researchers have gathered sufficient knowledge to dispel “conventional knowledge” of Asian Americans as model minorities. We questioned the extent to which studies explicitly measured student performance as a product of individual effort and Asian cultural influences, while s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Often, these features are assumed to be most salient for that particular group. For example, research on African American youth may focus on unfair treatment (e.g., Dotterer et al, 2009) or microaggressions (e.g., Solorzano, Ceja, & Yosso, 2000), while research with Asian American youth may explore their reaction to model minority stereotypes (e.g., Marinari, 2006;Tran & Birman, 2010). Other research seeks to compare racial groups, either exploring mean-level differences in climate (e.g., Hurtado, 1992;Kotori & Malaney, 2003;Mattison & Aber, 2007) or using mean differences in perceptions to explain differences in outcomes (e.g., Chavous, 2005;Green, Adams, & Turner, 1988).…”
Section: School Racial Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Often, these features are assumed to be most salient for that particular group. For example, research on African American youth may focus on unfair treatment (e.g., Dotterer et al, 2009) or microaggressions (e.g., Solorzano, Ceja, & Yosso, 2000), while research with Asian American youth may explore their reaction to model minority stereotypes (e.g., Marinari, 2006;Tran & Birman, 2010). Other research seeks to compare racial groups, either exploring mean-level differences in climate (e.g., Hurtado, 1992;Kotori & Malaney, 2003;Mattison & Aber, 2007) or using mean differences in perceptions to explain differences in outcomes (e.g., Chavous, 2005;Green, Adams, & Turner, 1988).…”
Section: School Racial Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the research on the damaging effects of stereotypes (e.g., Smith, 2004;Solorzano et al, 2000;Steele, 1997;Teranishi, 2002;Tran & Birman, 2010) while providing more specific indications of what aspects of the school racial climate were important.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When examining academic achievement among Asian American adolescents, it is important to distinguish between different aspects of performance, such as Grade Point Average and standardized test scores (Fuligni, 1997; Tran & Birman, 2010). Although Asian American adolescents usually score higher than their peers in English and mathematics classes (Witkow & Fuligni, 2005), they tend to display mixed patterns on standardized tests, often scoring similarly or higher in mathematics (Yan & Lin, 2005), and similarly or lower in reading, than their white counterparts (Aldous, 2006; Kao & Tienda, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developed in opposition to the 1960s civil rights movement as an example of equal opportunities for people of diverse backgrounds (Tran & Birman, 2010), the AAPI model minority stereotype persists. AAPI do consistently report better physical and mental health than other minorities (Leong & Lau, 2001; National Center for Health Statistics (US), 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%