Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3625-0_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questionnaire Reliability Under the Rasch Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Kendall tau coefficient quantified test-retest reliability. 21 A paired t test compared scores between administrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Kendall tau coefficient quantified test-retest reliability. 21 A paired t test compared scores between administrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Hamon and Mesbah (2002), the conclusion of intensive simulations shows that "the classical Cronbach alpha seems nevertheless to remain a good reliability coefficient under Rasch model assumptions. "…”
Section: Reliability Of An Instrument: Cronbach Alpha Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an initial rough clustering of items based on previous forced PCA with Varimax rotation, Cronbach alpha coefficient curves [49,50] were used to identify a precisely one-dimensional cluster of items. One single dimension (all items of the cluster measuring the same underlying construct) means that the above curves are increasing monotonically.…”
Section: Assessment Of Unidimensionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%