2018
DOI: 10.21037/apm.2018.03.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questionnaires measuring quality of life and satisfaction of patients and their relatives in a palliative care setting—German translation of FAMCARE-2 and the palliative care subscale of FACIT-Pal

Abstract: The final versions of the German translations have been authorized by the scale developers. The FAMCARE-2 and the FACIT-Pal are now available in German and can be used for research and quality control purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following cultural adaptation, the concurrent validity of the FACIT-Pal-TR was tested by performing correlation analysis between the FACIT-Pal-TR and the KPS and ESAS scales. Similar to previous studies of the psychometric properties of the FACIT-Pal in different cultures, 8,11,12 we found that patients who had better performance status and lower symptom severity had better QoL, thus verifying concurrent validity of FACIT-Pal-TR. For the construct validity of FACIT-Pal-TR, EFA and CFA were performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following cultural adaptation, the concurrent validity of the FACIT-Pal-TR was tested by performing correlation analysis between the FACIT-Pal-TR and the KPS and ESAS scales. Similar to previous studies of the psychometric properties of the FACIT-Pal in different cultures, 8,11,12 we found that patients who had better performance status and lower symptom severity had better QoL, thus verifying concurrent validity of FACIT-Pal-TR. For the construct validity of FACIT-Pal-TR, EFA and CFA were performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The FACIT-Pal psychometrics have been examined in a sample of 256 U.S. advanced cancer patients, 11 in three African countries with patients have HIV and/or cancer diagnosis, 8 and in a German sample. 12 Others 13,14 have evaluated the psychometric properties of FACIT-Pal shortened version.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All raters are certified for the applicable scores (mRS, NIHSS, MOCA). Patient-reported outcomes (measured by questionnaires) are the following: EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS (generic evaluation of QoL in 5 domains and overall on a visual analog scale) 83 , HADS-D (evaluation of anxiety and depression) 84 , WHODAS 2.0 (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule) 85 , and, for patients with PDAC, FACIT-Pal (evaluating QoL with focus on palliative symptoms and needs) 86 , 87 . All questionnaires are administered following the suppliers’ instructions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These HRQOL measures are not primarily designed to estimate the patient's views of their HRQOL status under specific conditions such as cancer condition, WHOQOL-BREF and EQ-5D measures have been applied to cancer survivor groups and cross-culturally adapted with many other languages [8,10,21,22]. Although there is a little consensus on how to maintain psychometric properties of their original version when creating cross-culturally adapted versions of it, these two instruments are increasingly being used in other disease groups [23][24][25][26]. While originally designed to approximate HRQOL status for being applicable cross culturally, versions of it often fail to maintain optimal psychometric properties such as dimensionality [8,23,24,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is a little consensus on how to maintain psychometric properties of their original version when creating cross-culturally adapted versions of it, these two instruments are increasingly being used in other disease groups [23][24][25][26]. While originally designed to approximate HRQOL status for being applicable cross culturally, versions of it often fail to maintain optimal psychometric properties such as dimensionality [8,23,24,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%