2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2006.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Queueing models of RAID systems with maxima of waiting times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As our case study, consider a parallel system with Poisson arrivals with rate parameter λ = 0.78 tasks/time unit and 3 parallel service nodes with exponential service time density functions: Exp(1), Exp(5), Exp (10).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our case study, consider a parallel system with Poisson arrivals with rate parameter λ = 0.78 tasks/time unit and 3 parallel service nodes with exponential service time density functions: Exp(1), Exp(5), Exp (10).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of subtask scheduling for RAID 01 read operations, we assume an efficient RAID controller which reads half the data from the primary disks and half the data from the mirror disks [7]. RAID 01 write operations send each subtask to both the primary and mirror disks and create double the number of ForkedCustomer s as for a read request of the same size.…”
Section: Raid 01 Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However in RAID 5, particularly with operations involving pre-reads and parity updates, there are many possibilities for scheduling strategies and disk head positioning times within a request. Here we base the design of our RAID 5 simulation upon the operational assumptions of RAID 5 disk behaviour presented in [4,7,11].…”
Section: Raid 5 Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From this, it is straightforward to calculate response time quantiles, as well as the mean, variance and higher moments of I/O request response time. This improves on the state-of-theart in RAID performance models [2][3][4][5][6], all of which yield approximations to the mean response time only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%