2006
DOI: 10.1145/1143518.1143520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Queueing Network-Model Human Processor (QN-MHP)

Abstract: Cloud computing has paved the way to the flexible deployment of software applications. This flexibility offers service providers a number of options to tailor their deployments to the observed and foreseen customer workloads, without incurring in large capital costs. However, cloud deployments pose novel challenges regarding application reliability and performance. Examples include managing the reliability of deployments that make use of spot instances, or coping with the performance variability caused by mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They could, however, learn distinct stimulus and response sequences simultaneously when one of them was coded as a color-sequence; this allowed the learning of the location sequence to take place without interference. Similarly, the Queueing Network-Model Human Processor, which models human behavior during concurrent driving tasks and multitasking performance more broadly, assumes that tasks can share resources in the central processing domain and that interference occurs most often when tasks compete for peripheral (e.g., visual) resources (Liu et al, 2006). Taken together, these findings begin to address the nature of the codes described in Wickens’ (1984) theory and what causes crosstalk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They could, however, learn distinct stimulus and response sequences simultaneously when one of them was coded as a color-sequence; this allowed the learning of the location sequence to take place without interference. Similarly, the Queueing Network-Model Human Processor, which models human behavior during concurrent driving tasks and multitasking performance more broadly, assumes that tasks can share resources in the central processing domain and that interference occurs most often when tasks compete for peripheral (e.g., visual) resources (Liu et al, 2006). Taken together, these findings begin to address the nature of the codes described in Wickens’ (1984) theory and what causes crosstalk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A task at a certain level is referred to as an exercise in this paper. Preliminary task analysis based on the human processor model (Card, Moran, & Newell, 1986; Y. Liu, Feyen, & Tsimhoni, 2006) and Therbligs (Gilbreth & Kent, 1911) was conducted to briefly describe the task demands across task levels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario a human subject undertakes a simultaneous CCTV monitoring task while multiple sensors track the environment. Therefore, our system can be widely utilized in various multi-human-multiagents system task scenarios, such as security monitoring [49], [64], air traffic management [50], [65], [66], and performance checking [51], [67]. Additionally, we only validated the AWAC on homogeneous missions and robot platforms, which limits its generalizability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%