GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2009.5425591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Queueing Strategies for Local Overload Control in SIP Server

Abstract: As other signaling protocols in the past, also SIP suffers of server overload leading to performance collapse. In this framework, recent Internet drafts propose the improvements of overload control mechanisms already presented in SIP and/or a closed loop system model for overload avoidance. In this framework, the paper presents the system simulator developed extending the Network Simulator (ns-2) with logical for local overload control. Furthermore, the paper proposes a new queueing discipline obtained combini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QoS is widely used in various systems as a means to capture the status of running systems. By contrast, in the actual operation of a server system, it is empirically known that the system has nonlinear dynamics and its QoS degrades catastrophically under overloaded conditions, and this has also been confirmed in experiments concerning the performance management of a server system [2,3,[14][15][16]. To summarize, QoS decline occurs because of the property that it can only be observed after an event, such as overload or resource depletion, has already occurred.…”
Section: Problem Of Observing the Dynamics Of Server Systemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…QoS is widely used in various systems as a means to capture the status of running systems. By contrast, in the actual operation of a server system, it is empirically known that the system has nonlinear dynamics and its QoS degrades catastrophically under overloaded conditions, and this has also been confirmed in experiments concerning the performance management of a server system [2,3,[14][15][16]. To summarize, QoS decline occurs because of the property that it can only be observed after an event, such as overload or resource depletion, has already occurred.…”
Section: Problem Of Observing the Dynamics Of Server Systemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, if the number of SIP messages in the buffer is greater than k sup or the number is increasing between k inf and k sup , the requests are rejected. In Garroppo et al and Ohta, two separate buffers are intended, one for invite requests and another for non‐invite requests . The non‐invite requests have high priority, and if their buffer becomes empty, the invite requests are processed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, SIP messages are prioritized according to their roles during the SIP session establishment, such as higher priority is given to INVITE messages over non‐INVITE messages and vice versa . In Guduru and Usha, the overload control is achieved with a priority queuing model to reduce the retransmissions by giving high priority to retransmitted requests and to avoid transmitting unnecessary retransmissions towards downstream of SIP network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local overload control is an internal mechanism that is used to keep the performance of the server in an acceptable level under overload conditions. The mechanism monitors the resources of the server, and a local overload is reported when the queue length [17][18][19][20][21] or CPU load is grater than the prespecified thresholds. 17,22 The queuing delay is also used as an indicator for overload condition.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%