2020
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2020.2982685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quick and Accurate False Data Detection in Mobile Crowd Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the work in [9] tackles data poisoning attacks on MCS platforms and the authors present the impact of data poisoning attacks on several machine learning classifiers when poisoning data are injected by the adversaries that are equipped with capabilities to build and run AI models. The study in [10] proposes a Lightweight Low Rank and False Matrix Separation (LightLRFMS) scheme to accelerate the computation time to detect false sensing data at significantly higher accuracy levels in comparison to the other separation / decomposition techniques.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the work in [9] tackles data poisoning attacks on MCS platforms and the authors present the impact of data poisoning attacks on several machine learning classifiers when poisoning data are injected by the adversaries that are equipped with capabilities to build and run AI models. The study in [10] proposes a Lightweight Low Rank and False Matrix Separation (LightLRFMS) scheme to accelerate the computation time to detect false sensing data at significantly higher accuracy levels in comparison to the other separation / decomposition techniques.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recent studies, however, mainly focus on challenges in the context of sensing task allocation, sparse sensing, privacy, and data integrity [6]. But only a few works try to address the problem of false data detection [7], [8]. For instance, there are data verification techniques such as Deco [8] which uses spatio-temporal techniques to reconstruct missing values.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods surrounding matrix separation have also been successfully used for separating false data. Light Weight Low Rank and Sparse Matrix Separation (LightLRFMS) [7] is a matrix separation technique but it was only validated on a specific MCS context for environmental monitoring that does not fully consider issues pertaining to concept-drift, which FSD strives to address based on the use of LSTMs. Furthermore, various deep learning techniques have previously been applied in MSC including LSTM models towards predicting traffic flow [10] or user mobility [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paper [40] used graph theory tree structure to construct an undirected spanning tree, and then broadcasted the route through the central node in the cluster, and searched first to get a minimum route spanning tree, and then used the algorithm of ant colony to traverse the minimum spanning tree, and finally got the optimal route in the cluster. Paper [41] divided the monitoring area into several sub-areas, looking for the highest energy node in the sub-area as the cluster head node, and the routing link formed by the cluster head nodes in all sub-areas. The above operation was repeated after N cycles, then a new routing link can be found, and finally the maximum optimized route for data transmission can be completed.…”
Section: B Optimizes Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%