2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa95b6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quiescent Prominence Dynamics Observed with the Hinode Solar Optical Telescope. II. Prominence Bubble Boundary Layer Characteristics and the Onset of a Coupled Kelvin–Helmholtz Rayleigh–Taylor Instability

Abstract: We analyze solar quiescent prominence bubble characteristics and instability dynamics using Hinode/Solar Optical Telescope (SOT) data. We measure bubble expansion rate, prominence downflows, and the profile of the boundary layer brightness and thickness as a function of time. The largest bubble analyzed rises into the prominence with a speed of about 1.3 km s −1 until it is destabilized by a localized shear flow on the boundary. Boundary layer thickness grows gradually as prominence downflows deposit plasma on… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
68
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
9
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the earliest appearance of the bubble, we find the signatures of rapid rotational motion within the bubble with a speed much faster relative to the intrinsic motions exhibited by the prominence material. These flows are found to be present within the bubble (Figure 2) as well as along its boundary (Figure 4) and can be characterized as shear flows (Berger et al, 2017). During the uprise and expansion phase of the bubble, prominence material gets accumulated on the boundary of the bubble.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the earliest appearance of the bubble, we find the signatures of rapid rotational motion within the bubble with a speed much faster relative to the intrinsic motions exhibited by the prominence material. These flows are found to be present within the bubble (Figure 2) as well as along its boundary (Figure 4) and can be characterized as shear flows (Berger et al, 2017). During the uprise and expansion phase of the bubble, prominence material gets accumulated on the boundary of the bubble.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, the most unstable modes become those that vary little along the field. This instability has been found to occur in a number of different situations in the solar atmosphere including in the interaction between prominences and bubbles that form below them (Ryutova et al 2010;Berger et al 2010Berger et al , 2017, or internal prominence motions (Hillier & Polito 2018;Yang et al 2018), and as a result of eruptions in the solar atmosphere (Foullon et al 2011;Ofman & Thompson 2011;Möstl et al 2013). Soler et al (2010) investigated how this instability develops on the surface of a rotating flux tube, a model used because of its geometrical connection to coronal loops, finding that the fundamental physics of the linear instability are not greatly altered by the change in geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the solar atmosphere, KH instability is observed at a variety of scales, e.g., as growing ripples at the interface between a prominence and the corona (Ryutova et al 2010;Berger et al 2017;Yang et al 2018;Hillier & Polito 2018). KH and other plasma instabilities are believed to be the key processes in dispersing and evaporating cool prominence material into the hot corona (Berger et al 2017;Hillier & Polito 2018;Li et al 2018a). Ofman & Thompson (2011) reported the growth and saturation of KH vortices at the interface between erupting and non-erupting plasmas during a coronal material ejection (CME) event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%