48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 2007
DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-1778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quiet Spike Prototype Flight Test Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the pitching moment coefficient ( C mq ) showed less damping, but it deviated outside the acceptable range in transonic and supersonic regimes. The same conclusion was validated by Donald et al 113 that the spike is beneficial for reduction of the sonic boom, but it possesses destabilizing contribution to aircraft in supersonic conditions. However, further studies concluded that short-period damping was decreased in subsonic and supersonic regimes but increased in the transonic region.…”
Section: Passive Flow Control Techniquessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, the pitching moment coefficient ( C mq ) showed less damping, but it deviated outside the acceptable range in transonic and supersonic regimes. The same conclusion was validated by Donald et al 113 that the spike is beneficial for reduction of the sonic boom, but it possesses destabilizing contribution to aircraft in supersonic conditions. However, further studies concluded that short-period damping was decreased in subsonic and supersonic regimes but increased in the transonic region.…”
Section: Passive Flow Control Techniquessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…While shock waves are inherent to supersonic flight and cannot be eliminated, the ground pressure distribution can be modified by varying the aircraft geometry [46]. Therefore, it will be advantageous as research continues to consider a supersonic aircraft capable of in-flight sonic boom mitigation for different flight and atmospheric conditions to satisfy acceptable loudness requirements at ground level while also generating low drag [47,48].…”
Section: Strategies To Mitigate Perceived Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional control surfaces could be added to the vehicle to induce significant geometric changes, allowing for boom shaping. Some features such as a quiet spike (a reconfigurable nose cone) could change the length of the aircraft and the sonic boom signature [47].…”
Section: Large Reconfigurations (Trl 8)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45, is that the series of weak shocks generated by each of the telescoping sections will not coalesce into an N-wave but propagate to the ground in parallel fashion. The Quiet Spike has proven that it can play a significant role in achieving the desired area distribution for a low-boom aeroplane [108][109][110]. During the NASA N+2 Advanced Supersonic Commercial Transport Aircraft project, tests were carried out in NASA Ames 9'×7' supersonic wind tunnel to validate boom shaping tools.…”
Section: Mitigation Through Exotic Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%