2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019ja026936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quiet Time Structured Pc1 Waves Generated During Transient Foreshock

Abstract: We study two events of structured Pc1 waves (pearls) observed by CARISMA magnetometers during a period of quiet magnetic (Kp~1) and solar wind conditions on 1 August 2008. Bursts of proton precipitations and electromagnetic ion-cyclotron waves were simultaneously observed by NOAA/POES and GOES satellites at dayside. Apparent correspondence was found between ground pearl pulsations and magnetospheric compressions observed by GOES and THEMIS satellites. We have found the Pc1 wave splitting into very close subfre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several studies that discuss the possible relationship between foreshock transients and ground Pc1 activities (Engebretson et al, 2013;Posch et al, 2013;Suvorova et al, 2019). Our study reports unique and clear observational characteristics which are distinct from previous studies.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been several studies that discuss the possible relationship between foreshock transients and ground Pc1 activities (Engebretson et al, 2013;Posch et al, 2013;Suvorova et al, 2019). Our study reports unique and clear observational characteristics which are distinct from previous studies.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…There have been several studies that discuss the possible relationship between foreshock transients and ground Pc1 activities (Engebretson et al., 2013; Posch et al., 2013; Suvorova et al., 2019). Our study reports unique and clear observational characteristics which are distinct from previous studies. We found that there were at least 3 events (events 1, 4, and 5 or 6) showing ∼8 min time delay between space FT observations and ground Pc1 wave observations. Waves were observed in both hemispheres in the high‐latitude region. During the entire event period, no inner magnetospheric EMIC waves were observed by spacecraft, such as Van Allen Probes, THEMIS, and GOES13 (Figure ). Wave observation times were slightly different between the hemispheres.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%