2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00229-016-0914-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quiver GIT for varieties with tilting bundles

Abstract: Abstract. In the setting of a variety X admitting a tilting bundle T we consider the problem of constructing X as a quiver GIT quotient of the algebra A := End X (T ) op . We prove that if the tilting equivalence restricts to a bijection between the skyscraper sheaves of X and the closed points of a quiver representation moduli functor for A = End X (T ) op then X is indeed a fine moduli space for this moduli functor, and we prove this result without any assumptions on the singularities of X . As an applicatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that G is injective is just 4.4, and so G is bijective. The fact that its inverse is given by F is precisely [Kar,5.2.5], with the small caveat that [Kar,5.2.5] works with the opposite algebra, but only since his conventions for composing morphisms are opposite to ours.…”
Section: Under This Correspondencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fact that G is injective is just 4.4, and so G is bijective. The fact that its inverse is given by F is precisely [Kar,5.2.5], with the small caveat that [Kar,5.2.5] works with the opposite algebra, but only since his conventions for composing morphisms are opposite to ours.…”
Section: Under This Correspondencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. Part (1) follows immediately from [Kar,5.2.5] applied to X. By 4.2, part (2) follows from [Kar,5.2.5] applied to X + .…”
Section: Flops and Mutationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The statement of part (i) is due originally to Karmazyn [23,Corollary 5.4.5], while an analogue of part (ii) in the complete local setting can be deduced by combining Iyama-Kalck-Wemyss-Yang [26,Theorem 4.6] with [23,Corollary 5.2.5]. Note however that our approach is completely different in each case, and is closer in spirit to the geometric construction of the Special McKay correspondence for cyclic subgroups of GL(2, k) given by Craw [16].…”
Section: Theorem 12 Let G ⊂ Gl(2 K) Be a Finite Subgroup Without Psmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 7.4.3. When M ∼ = Y and E = O ∆ , equation (7.9) gives T = E ∨ ; see Karmazyn [Kar14] and references therein for many examples where this is known to hold.…”
Section: On Schemes Admitting a Tilting Bundlementioning
confidence: 99%