1977
DOI: 10.1017/s0009838800035825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quo Usque Tandem Patiemini?

Abstract: In his article (CP 71 (1976), 97–105) R. Reneham rightly classes Sail. Cat.20.9 as a conscious imitation of Cic.Cat.1.1, but adopts the unsatisfactory explanation of parody. Such parody is, as he notes, without parallel in Sallust and ineptly distracts attention from the vigorous development of Catiline's rhetoric. Elsewhere mimesis is regularly a compliment to the author imitated, often closely functional by reinforcing a point from the parallel of a similar context (e.g. Sail. Cat.4.1 ~ Pl. Ep.324 b). Simila… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All rationalizing scruples about the representation of divine action directly in historiography are fully abandoned in the truly miraculous images of the furies of 53. Innes 1977. 54.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All rationalizing scruples about the representation of divine action directly in historiography are fully abandoned in the truly miraculous images of the furies of 53. Innes 1977. 54.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%