2020
DOI: 10.1112/plms.12369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quotient theorems in polyfold theory and S1‐equivariant transversality

Abstract: We introduce group actions on polyfolds and polyfold bundles. We prove quotient theorems for polyfolds, when the group action has finite isotropy. We prove that the sc-Fredholm property is preserved under quotient if the base polyfold is infinite dimensional. The quotient construction is the main technical tool in the construction of equivariant fundamental class in our future work. We also analyze the equivariant transversality near the fixed locus in the polyfold setting. In the case of S 1-action with fixed… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second chain homotopy is as claimed in Theorem 1.3 (iii) but with ι = id, which requires arguing that the only isolated holomorphic spheres with two marked points evaluating to an unstable and stable manifold are constant. This again requires S 1equivariant transversality (which we expect to be able to achieve with the techniques in [39]). (iii) Theorem 1.3 is proven by following the [30]-approach as above but avoiding the use of new polyfold technology such as equivariant or strata-avoiding perturbations.…”
Section: Remark 14 (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second chain homotopy is as claimed in Theorem 1.3 (iii) but with ι = id, which requires arguing that the only isolated holomorphic spheres with two marked points evaluating to an unstable and stable manifold are constant. This again requires S 1equivariant transversality (which we expect to be able to achieve with the techniques in [39]). (iii) Theorem 1.3 is proven by following the [30]-approach as above but avoiding the use of new polyfold technology such as equivariant or strata-avoiding perturbations.…”
Section: Remark 14 (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires S 1 -equivariant transversality to argue that isolated Floer trajectories must be S 1 -invariant, hence Morse trajectories. A conceptually transparent construction of equivariant and transverse perturbationsunder transversality assumptions at the fixed point set which are met in this settingcan be found in [39], assuming a polyfold description of Floer trajectories. (ii) The second approach to Theorem 1.1 by [30] is to construct a direct isomorphism between the Floer homology of the given Hamiltonian and the Morse homology for some unrelated Morse function.…”
Section: Remark 14 (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note some additional properties of the objects constructed in the proof of Lemma 4.2. These properties are required for the construction of quotients of polyfolds by group actions in [24]. The sc-Banach space K is given by…”
Section: Slice Coordinates For Local Submersions To R Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tame strong bundle charts on a tame strong bundle ρ : E → B induce a double filtration E m,k for m ≥ 0 and 0 ≤ k ≤ m + 1 from the double filtration (24) on the bundle retracts in the charts. From this we distinguish the M -polyfolds E[i] for i = 0, 1, by the filtrations (54)…”
Section: Slicing Tame Sc-fredholm Sections With Transverse Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use it to obtain automatic closedness of a chain in the computation of planarity for any augmentation. In Remark 7.20, we explain how one can drop this condition using polyfold techniques in [82]. On the other hand, the role of k < 3n−1 2 is more mysterious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%