2015
DOI: 10.1515/ijme-2015-0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

R&D Activities in Oligopoly and Social Welfare

Abstract: This paper analyzes the impact of R&D activities in an oligopoly on consumer surplus and social welfare. We use a two-stage model to analyze the behavior of duopolists at the research level, and in the final-product market, under the assumption of linear and quadratic cost functions. Three options for firm competition are considered: 1) Cournot competition at both stages; 2) cooperation at the R&D stage and Cournot competition in the final-product market; and 3) cooperation at both stages. Numerical si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result provides an empirical proof of the possible instability of price collusive cartels on agricultural markets. This topic was the subject of several theoretical studies in particular (d' Aspremont et al, 1983;d'Aspremont and Gabszewicz, 1986;Donsimoni et al, 1986;Lambertini, 1996;Prokop, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result provides an empirical proof of the possible instability of price collusive cartels on agricultural markets. This topic was the subject of several theoretical studies in particular (d' Aspremont et al, 1983;d'Aspremont and Gabszewicz, 1986;Donsimoni et al, 1986;Lambertini, 1996;Prokop, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Products to be bought: They organize themselves in association by products that they predominantly want to buy in the rural areas. This creates some homogeneity between intermediaries according to products which can be a source of cartel instability mainly in terms of price rules (Prokop, 2009). This is in some sense rational to limit competition between buyers for the same product to keep a strong bargaining power when facing the farmers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%