2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2003.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

R&D expenditure in G7 countries and the implications for endogenous fluctuations and growth

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
62
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect however is not statistically significant. 21 Walde and Woitek (2004) find that the level of R&D expenditure tends to be procyclical in the G7 countries between 1973 and 2000. (See also Walde, 2004.)…”
Section: Amplification Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect however is not statistically significant. 21 Walde and Woitek (2004) find that the level of R&D expenditure tends to be procyclical in the G7 countries between 1973 and 2000. (See also Walde, 2004.)…”
Section: Amplification Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Wälde and Woitek (2004) study the cyclical behaviour of R&D expenditures by business enterprises in G7 countries from 1973 to 2000 and they find evidence of procyclical rather than countercyclical R&D spending. Similarly, Domadenik, Prašnikar and Svejnar (2008) using data on more than 150 of the largest 4 A firm undertaking R&D investment is more likely to default when the research project fails so the value of the project as a collateral is riskier and harder acceptable than if the firm offers a real estate to a lender as a collateral.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With few exceptions (Nickell et al, 2001;Francois and Lloyd-Ellis, 2008), the procyclicality of R&D and innovation has been observed over various business cycles and for a variety of countries (e.g. Griliches, 1990;Broda and Weinstein, 2010;Barlevy, 2002Barlevy, , 2007Comin and Gertler, 2006;Fatas, 2000;Francois and Lloyd-Ellis, 2008;Rafferty, 2003;Walde and Woitek, 2004).…”
Section: What To Expect Of Innovation As a Results Of The Crises?mentioning
confidence: 99%