R&amp;D performance measurement: A process perspective revisited

Lalienė, Rasa; Ojanen, Ville

doi:10.1109/ieem.2015.7385793

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They report the proposed approach as a useful tool for performance measurement of GRIs and it can be used for fostering effective policies. In another paper Laliene and Ojanen (2015) presented a systematic approach for R&D performance measurement at organizational level. Their model contained a well-known R&D key processes chain: input, in process, output, transfer system and outcome.…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

A GIS-based DANP-VIKOR approach to evaluate R&D performance of Turkish cities

Özkan

Özceylan²,

Korkmaz

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study is to measure the R&D performance of 81 cities in Turkey by using a scientific approach. Design/methodology/approach A four-step solution approach is developed for this problem. In the first step, a hierarchical structure of 14 indicators (including number of patents, publications, R&D expense, etc.) in three dimensions is constructed. In the second step, explicitly and implicitly spatial indicators such as university location and R&D manpower are mapped by using geographic information system (GIS). In the third step, a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model, namely, DANP that combines decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and analytic hierarchy process (ANP) techniques is applied to assign different level of importance to the indicators. In the last step, Višekriterijumska Optimizacijai kompromisno Rešenje (VIKOR) method is used to rank the performance of 81 cities. Obtained results are visualized using GIS to show the pros and cons of each city in terms of R&D performance. Findings Results of the paper show that Istanbul, Ankara and Konya are ordered as contenders of best R&D performances and on the contrary, Igdir, Sirnak and Tunceli are ordered as the worst R&D performances among 81 cities. Research limitations/implications One limitation of the study can be the considered criteria. However, all the criteria are obtained from literature and experts; thus, the paper covers as much criteria as possible. Practical implications The proposed study may allow Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology of Turkey to formulate more effective strategies to improve cities’ R&D performance. In addition, any country can apply the same methodology for measuring the R&D performance of their cities by using their related data. As the worst R&D city performances belong to the eastern part of Turkey, it can be deducted that the socio-cultural structure of the eastern part of the country needs improvement. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study which applies a GIS-based MCDM approach for R&D performance measurement. Thus, the value of this paper belongs to both literature and real life.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%