2016
DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2016.1146125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know

Abstract: Article (Accepted Version) http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Martin, Ben R (2016) R&D policy instruments -a critical review of what we do and don't know. Industry and Innovation, 23 (2). pp. 157-176. ISSN 1366157-176. ISSN -2716 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/58671/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent shift in the understanding the nature of the innovation process has led to a fundamental change in public policy for supporting innovation, according to Borrá s and Edquist (2013). Recent articles also question the usefulness of public policy recommendations based on academic research, when researchers are too far away from the political context of policy makers (Flanagan and Uyarra 2016) as well as when the policy design and instruments proposed is far from the reality of policy makers (Martin 2016). Previously, public policy for research and innovation was predominantly concerned with supporting science and addressing market failures hindering the application of new scientific knowledge, which is in line with the linear model of innovation.…”
Section: Innovation Policy Understood Through the Governance Of Reseamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent shift in the understanding the nature of the innovation process has led to a fundamental change in public policy for supporting innovation, according to Borrá s and Edquist (2013). Recent articles also question the usefulness of public policy recommendations based on academic research, when researchers are too far away from the political context of policy makers (Flanagan and Uyarra 2016) as well as when the policy design and instruments proposed is far from the reality of policy makers (Martin 2016). Previously, public policy for research and innovation was predominantly concerned with supporting science and addressing market failures hindering the application of new scientific knowledge, which is in line with the linear model of innovation.…”
Section: Innovation Policy Understood Through the Governance Of Reseamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 'policy legacies' shape the options open to future policy makers (Kay, 2006). Policy rationales and policy instruments thus accumulate over time, interacting with each other as well as with actors in a complex and largely unpredictable manner (Martin, 2016).…”
Section: Regional Innovation Policy Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…each new policy instrument will clearly interact with and affect existing policy instruments in a complex and often unpredictable manner." ( [40], p. 167). These surprising deviations from expected results in a benchmark-oriented policy design remain unexplained in mainstream analysis but become visible in agent-based models including an adequate level of complexity.…”
Section: Agent-based Models Policy Laboratories and Regional Develomentioning
confidence: 99%