R&D project selection using the analytic network process

Abstract

The analytic network process (ANP) is presented as a potentially valuable method to support the selection of projects in a research and development (R&D) environment. This paper first discusses the requirements of the R&D project selection problem, which requires the allocation of resources to a set of competing and often disparate project proposals. Among the factors complicating this task is the need to make the decision within the framework of an enterprise's strategic objectives and organizational structure while considering and integrating financial and strategic benefits of each project. The paper discusses the use of the ANP, a general form of Saaty's analytic hierarchy process, as a model to evaluate the value of competing R&D project proposals. A generic ANP model developed by the authors, which includes in its decision levels the actors involved in the decision, the stages of research, categories of metrics, and individual metrics, is presented. The paper concludes with a case study describing the implementation of this model at a small high-tech company, including data based on the actual use of the decision making model.

A Dynamic Programming Approach to Identifying the Shortest Path in Virtual Learning Environments

“…The top element of the hierarchy is the overall goal for the decision model. The hierarchy decomposes to a more specific criterion on a level of manageable decision criteria (Meade & Presley, 2002). Under each criterion, sub-criteria elements relative to the criterion can be constructed.…”

Strategic Approach Model for Investigating the Cause of Maritime Accidents

“…According to [35] computing a supermatrix is a convenient way for overcoming interdependencies among different clusters, which is known as ANP method in literature [36]. The advantages of ANP contain the capability for including dependencies and feedbacks using a hierarchical decision network as well as representing and analyzing interactions, and synthesizing their reciprocal effects by following a logical procedure [26,37].…”

“…The other technique involved in the proposed methodology is the analytic network process (ANP). ANP is widely applied to cope with the problems of interdependence and feedback among criteria, sub-criteria and alternatives [26]. ANP method works by classifying the criteria of an entire system to form a supermatrix by pair-wise comparisons and search an answer for the question "How much importance does one criterion have compared to another criterion, with respect to our interests or preferences?"…”

A model for selecting project team members using multicriteria group decision making

“…A lower and an upper threshold should be defined, amongst which the weights can vary (Meade & Presley, 2002):…”