2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

R-curve modeling for Ni/Al2O3 laminates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equating the load-line displacement to the bridging law given by Eq. (9), which represents the materials resistance to crack opening in the bridging zone, leads one to (15) in which the function f are functions of the crack geometry. Four different crack geometries including double cantilever beam, single cantilever bend, single-edge bend (SEB), and T-crack geometries were included in the micromechanical code.…”
Section: Micromechanical Code For Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equating the load-line displacement to the bridging law given by Eq. (9), which represents the materials resistance to crack opening in the bridging zone, leads one to (15) in which the function f are functions of the crack geometry. Four different crack geometries including double cantilever beam, single cantilever bend, single-edge bend (SEB), and T-crack geometries were included in the micromechanical code.…”
Section: Micromechanical Code For Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight function for SEB was taken from the paper by Fett and Munez [13], while the weight function for the T-crack was treated as a SCB crack with a fixed end [14]. The integral equation was solved by utilizing the polynomial expansion approach described by Mekky and Nicholson [15] and by Fett et al [16].…”
Section: Micromechanical Code For Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several ceramic composites and, in particular, laminated structures were developed in recent years to enhance strength, toughness and to improve flaw tolerance. Fracture resistance and R-curve behaviour were achieved in laminated composites with (i) thin layers in residual compression alternated to thick layers in tension able to arrest surface and internal cracks and produce a threshold strength (Rao et al, 1999;Orlovskaya et al, 2005;Bermejo et al, 2006;Bermejo & Danzer, 2010;Nahliḱ et al, 2010), (ii) weak or porous interlayers that generate graceful and tortuous crack propagation paths (Davis et al, 2000;She et al, 2000), (iii) high strength surface layers and high toughness core, able to arrest starting surface flaws and to limit long cracks propagation, respectively, (Cho et al, 2001) and (iv) metallic layers that promote ductile bridging effects (Mekky & Nicholson, 2007). The limitations of such laminates are related to processing difficulties and to the fact that they can be used only when the tensile load is applied parallel to the layers, thus being not easily suitable to produce real components such as shells or tubes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S everal laminate structures were studied in recent years as possible solutions to overcome the traditional brittleness and low reliability of ceramic materials. Laminates with (i) metallic layers that promote ductile bridging effects, 1 with weak or porous interlayers that introduce low‐energy paths for crack propagation, 2,3 (ii) high strength surface layers and a high toughness body in order to combine and optimize both the characteristics, 4 and (iii) thin layers in residual compression alternating with thick layers in tension in order to arrest cracks and produce a threshold strength 5 have been proposed. The limitations of such laminates rely on processing difficulties and the fact that they can be used only with a specific orientation with respect to the applied load, and therefore they are not easily suitable to produce real components such as shells or tubes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%