Background: Epidemiological studies have repeatedly observed a markedly higher risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) in Scotland as compared to England. Up to now, it is unclear whether environmental or genetic factors might explain this phenomenon. Methods: Studying UK Biobank we assessed CAD risk based on the Framingham risk score (FRS) and common genetic variants to explore the respective contribution to CAD prevalence in Scotland (n=31,963) and England (n=317,889). We calculated FRS based on sex, age, body mass index, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, smoking status, and diabetes. We determined the allele frequency of published genome-wide significant risk CAD alleles and a weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) for quantifying genetic CAD risk.Results: Prevalence of CAD was 16% higher in Scotland as compared to England (8.98% vs. 7.68%, P<0.001). By contrast, the FRS predicted a less than 1% higher CAD risk in Scotland (12.5±10.5 vs.12.6±10.6, P=0.03). Likewise, the overall number genome-wide significant variants affecting CAD risk (157.6±7.7 and 157.5±7.7; P=0.12) and a wGRS for CAD (2.49±0.25 in both populations, P=0.14) were remarkably similar in the English and Scottish population. Interestingly, we observed substantial differences with respect to the allele frequencies of individual risk variants. Of the previously described 163 genome-wide significant variants studied here 35 had higher frequencies in Scotland whereas 37 had higher frequencies in England (P<0.001 each).Conclusions: Neither the traditional risk factors included in the FRS nor a GRS based on established common risk alleles explained the higher CAD prevalence in Scotland. However, we observed marked differences in the distribution of individual risk alleles which emphasizes that even geographically and ethnically closely related populations may display relevant differences in the genetic architecture of a common disease.