2011
DOI: 10.4194/trjfas.2011.0204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Nine isonitrogenous (30% crude protein approximately) and isocaloric (18.23 kJ g -1 ) experimental diets (D1-D9) were formulated either with raw or treated (fermented with fish intestinal bacteria) Eichhornia crassipes leaf meal at 20%, 30% and 40% levels replacing other ingredients partially from a fish meal based reference diet (RD). Two specific strains of fish intestinal bacteria, Bacillus subtilis CY5 (isolated from Cyprinus carpio) and B. megaterium CI3 (isolated from Ctenopharyngodon idella) having extr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the water quality at the respective locations. The results reported for the same species by others are of the same magnitude: 21.5% by Mako et al (2011), 17% in leaves (Saha andRay 2011), 19% by Promdee et al (2012), 22.9% by Fileto-Pérez et al (2013), and 12.4% in leaves by Sotolu (2012). Table 2 shows the microanalysis of ash.…”
Section: Chemical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be due to the water quality at the respective locations. The results reported for the same species by others are of the same magnitude: 21.5% by Mako et al (2011), 17% in leaves (Saha andRay 2011), 19% by Promdee et al (2012), 22.9% by Fileto-Pérez et al (2013), and 12.4% in leaves by Sotolu (2012). Table 2 shows the microanalysis of ash.…”
Section: Chemical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The amount of condensed tannins (T) in roots and leaves in our study ranged from 5.4 by aqueous to 6.9 wt.% by ethanolic extraction. This content is higher compared to that reported for leaves (0.98%) in E. crassipes (Saha and Ray 2011) or similar to that found in the bark of Pinus leiophylla (5.8%), Pinus durangensis (6.4%) (Rosales and González 2003), and in the bark of Erythroxylon compactum (5.6%) (Colín et al 2013). However, the tannin content in E. crassipes was lower than the value reported as suitable for commercial potential (Colín-Urieta et al 2013).…”
Section: Tannins Contentsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Water hyacinth has been reported to be used as feed for cattle [47,48], goats [49][50][51][52], sheep [53], pigs [54,55], ducks [56,57], rabbits [58,59], fish [45,[60][61][62][63] and other animals.…”
Section: Water Hyacinth For Feedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, wilted water hyacinth was stated to reduce digestibility and intake as feed, yet it was also reported as an economically viable substitute in the areas it invaded, as its availability is guaranteed [46]. Another major disadvantage of using water hyacinth as feed is the high crude fibre content of the plant, which may lead to a lower feed conversion (feed/weight gain) ratio and can be an anti-nutritional factor for certain animals [63]. However, this can be overcome through fermentation with added microbes [57,63].…”
Section: Water Hyacinth For Feedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation