Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 provides the sample frequencies of exits (in percentages)-broken down into failures and mergers-by firm size and firm age. It largely supports the finding of the previous literature that exit rates tend to decrease with age (Stinchcombe 1965, Caroll 1983, Amburgey et al 1993, Olzak and West 1991, Mata and Portugal 1994, Audretsch et al 2000 and size (Brüderl et al 1992, Barron 1999, Audretsch et al 2000, Agarwal and Audretsch 2001, Segarra and Callejón 2002. More specifically, looking at exits by age (rightmost column), we find that exit rates decrease monotonically, with the exception of a negligible rebound for three-year-old firms.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Table 2 provides the sample frequencies of exits (in percentages)-broken down into failures and mergers-by firm size and firm age. It largely supports the finding of the previous literature that exit rates tend to decrease with age (Stinchcombe 1965, Caroll 1983, Amburgey et al 1993, Olzak and West 1991, Mata and Portugal 1994, Audretsch et al 2000 and size (Brüderl et al 1992, Barron 1999, Audretsch et al 2000, Agarwal and Audretsch 2001, Segarra and Callejón 2002. More specifically, looking at exits by age (rightmost column), we find that exit rates decrease monotonically, with the exception of a negligible rebound for three-year-old firms.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…iv Segarra and Callejón (2002) and Segarra et al (2002b) show that the survival patterns of new Spanish manufacturing firms are similar to those of other countries. v The interested reader is referred to, for example, Segarra et al (2002b) and the references therein.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Segarra and Callejón (2002) believe that industry entry rate can represent both barriers to entry and competition: in particular, high entry rate means low level of entry barrier and high degree of competition; on the other hand, their findings also show that even in the industries with high competition or with significant barriers high entry rate still appears. Regarding entry barrier, though the linkage between entry barrier and exit barrier is supported by for example Fotopoulos and Louri (2000) with the case of sunk cost, according to the study of McAfee, Mialon and Williams (2004) whether sunk cost per se (as well as economies of scale and capital requirements) can be classified as entry barrier is an arguing point because of different definitions of entry barrier.…”
Section: Hypothesis 8: General Liquidity Is a Positive Indicator To Smentioning
confidence: 92%