2007
DOI: 10.1130/ges00055.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: This paper presents a plate-scale model for the Precambrian growth and evolution of the North American continent. The core of the North American continent (Canadian shield) came together in the Paleoproterozoic (2.0-1.8 Ga) by plate collisions of Archean continents (Slave with Rae-Hearne, then Rae-Hearne with Superior) as well as smaller Archean continental fragments (Wyoming, Medicine Hat, Sask, Marshfi eld, Nain cratons). The resulting Trans-Hudson orogen was a collisional belt similar in scale to the modern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
387
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 761 publications
(404 citation statements)
references
References 211 publications
(257 reference statements)
15
387
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Jemez lineament is an alignment of Miocene and younger volcanic centers and geologic features that extends from east central Arizona to northeastern New Mexico (Figure 1) [e.g., Aldrich, 1986], and it aligns with the structural grain of the Precambrian basement in the region [e.g., Gilbert et al, 2007]. It also lies in an area thought to be a transition zone between the Yavapai and Mazatzal terranes [e.g., Whitmeyer and Karlstrom, 2007].…”
Section: Regional Geologic Setting and Previous Geophysical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Jemez lineament is an alignment of Miocene and younger volcanic centers and geologic features that extends from east central Arizona to northeastern New Mexico (Figure 1) [e.g., Aldrich, 1986], and it aligns with the structural grain of the Precambrian basement in the region [e.g., Gilbert et al, 2007]. It also lies in an area thought to be a transition zone between the Yavapai and Mazatzal terranes [e.g., Whitmeyer and Karlstrom, 2007].…”
Section: Regional Geologic Setting and Previous Geophysical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each episode of addition of juvenile crust and its transformation into stable continental crust was facilitated by voluminous granitoid plutonism that stitched new and previously existing orogenic boundaries. Slab rollback created transient extensional basins (1.70 and 1.65 Ga), where Palaeoproterozoic quartzite-rhyolite successions were deposited [Whitmeyer, Karlstrom, 2007]. Between 1.73 and 1.48 Ga, the accretionary crustal growth along the southwestern edge of the East European Craton (EEC) was directed toward the west.…”
Section: Lauoroscandia Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38] Similarly, we interpret the E-NE trending lineament of thickened crust traversing southern Colorado and northern New Mexico as a crustal welt left from the suturing of the Proterozoic Yavapai and Mazatzal provinces [e.g., Whitmeyer and Karlstrom, 2007]. The location of the exact suture is uncertain [see Shaw and Karlstrom, 1999], and other workers have suggested the main suturing occurred further south along the Jemez lineament in New Mexico [Magnani et al, 2004].…”
Section: Precambrian Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the late Cretaceous, this region has risen from sea level to an average elevation of about 3 km; the zenith of a long-wavelength ($1000 km) epeirogenic swell and the largest regional-scale topographic anomaly in North America [Eaton, 2008]. This N-S trending feature cuts across the grain of ancient structural features, including northeast trends associated with the Proterozoic accretion of the Colorado Province [Reed et al, 1987;Whitmeyer and Karlstrom, 2007] and northwest trends associated with the formation of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains [Kluth and Coney, 1981]. In addition to their topographic prominence, the CRM displays a long-wavelength Bouguer gravity low reaching À330 mGal, elevated surface heat flow up to 100 mW/m 2 [Decker, 1995;Reiter, 2008], and reduced seismic velocities in the crust and upper mantle [e.g., Schmandt and Humphreys, 2010;Shen et al, 2013].…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%