2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2016.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rabbit-specific computational modelling of ventricular cell electrophysiology: Using populations of models to explore variability in the response to ischemia

Abstract: Computational modelling, combined with experimental investigations, is a powerful method for investigating complex cardiac electrophysiological behaviour. The use of rabbit-specific models, due to the similarities of cardiac electrophysiology in this species with human, is especially prevalent. In this paper, we first briefly review rabbit-specific computational modelling of ventricular cell electrophysiology, multi-cellular simulations including cellular heterogeneity, and acute ischemia. This mini-review is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
(212 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These calibrated POMs have been used to great effect, including suggesting modifications to existing models of rabbit ventricular ( 15 ) and human atrial cells ( 16 ) required to reproduce specific data; determining the electrophysiological properties that lead to the dangerous phenomena of alternans ( 17 , 18 ), repolarization abnormalities ( 19 ), and atrial fibrillation ( 20 ); and characterizing the sources of the differing function of failing hearts ( 21 ). The technique has also been used to explore the variable response of a population to antiarrhythmic drug treatments ( 7 , 22 , 23 ), to the onset of ischemia in rabbits ( 24 ), and to the effects of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ( 25 ). Most relevant to our work, calibrated POMs were used by Sánchez et al ( 26 ) to explore the differences between patients exhibiting sinus rhythm (SR) or chronic atrial fibrillation (cAF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These calibrated POMs have been used to great effect, including suggesting modifications to existing models of rabbit ventricular ( 15 ) and human atrial cells ( 16 ) required to reproduce specific data; determining the electrophysiological properties that lead to the dangerous phenomena of alternans ( 17 , 18 ), repolarization abnormalities ( 19 ), and atrial fibrillation ( 20 ); and characterizing the sources of the differing function of failing hearts ( 21 ). The technique has also been used to explore the variable response of a population to antiarrhythmic drug treatments ( 7 , 22 , 23 ), to the onset of ischemia in rabbits ( 24 ), and to the effects of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ( 25 ). Most relevant to our work, calibrated POMs were used by Sánchez et al ( 26 ) to explore the differences between patients exhibiting sinus rhythm (SR) or chronic atrial fibrillation (cAF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general contention in every study involving populations of cardiac electrophysiology models is that action potential variability is a consequence of changes in the magnitude of the ionic currents that produce the AP, as opposed to a change in their underlying dynamics [8]. Therefore, a population of models (PoM) was generated here by varying all the peak conductances and maximal currents in the TP06 model, these parameters are listed in the literature [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse problem, however, is much more complicated since it is both ill-posed and highly sensitive to intersubject variability [7]. An additional complication is that models for cardiac electrophysiology are based mainly on averaged responses which represent the most common case; a consequential limitation is that, in their existing form, model predictions cannot discriminate pathological behavior from normal physiological variability [8]. Notwithstanding, "experimentally calibrated populations of models" (ePoM) [9][10][11][12] is a promising recent development that includes the effects of variability in the model parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please see also related communications in this issue by Quinn and Kohl (2016) and Gemmel et al (2016) .…”
Section: Editors' Notementioning
confidence: 99%