“…Figure b shows similar gene expression profiles for (i) cells cultured in stiff 3D conditions (“stiff to stiff”) and cells moved from stiff to soft 3D culture (“stiff to soft”) and (ii) cells cultured in soft 3D conditions (“soft to soft”) and cells moved from soft to stiff 3D culture (“soft to stiff”). Remarkably, the top three downregulated genes in conditions where cells experienced a stiff 3D microenvironment for any length of time were tumor suppressor genes LATS1 , BCAR3 , and CDKN2C . − Of the top upregulated genes in stiff-primed conditions (log 2 fold-change >2, p -value < 0.05), several of these genes have been identified as prognostic markers in cancer, including SLC6A4 , MACC1 , SLC14A2 , CRB3 , NFKBIL1 , RAC3 , CLIC3 , CYBA , FRMD6-AS1 , LAIR1 , L1TD1 , SEMA3E , PCDH11Y , MIRLET7BHG , and TERC (Figure b). − We performed GO Term analysis comparing cells primed in soft culture vs cells primed in stiff culture and note changes in terms including transcriptional misregulation in cancer, chromatin organization, nucleus organization, and metabolism of RNA, which may suggest epigenetic mechanisms act as a component responsible for some of these transcriptional changes (Figure S9). For the genes that may be correlated with mechanical memory, we examined TCGA for pancreatic cancer patient prognosis data .…”