1989
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4405(89)90043-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race and gender effects on item functioning on the Kaufman assessment battery for children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not used as frequently, this method has been found to perform at a level comparable to or better than other methods (Valencia, Rankin, & Livingston, 1995;Willson, Nolan, Reynolds, & Kamphaus, 1989), Although this is not a perfect measure of item bias, its comparative superiority in performance relative to other methods, coupled with its ease of computation, makes it a method of choice for the applied researcher. Because no single method can identify item bias accurately, it is apt to heed Camilli and Shepard's (1994) recommendation that professional judgment involving poststatistical computations in an attempt to explain why a particular item functioned differently for a particular subgroup ought to be considered.…”
Section: Detecting Item Bias: the Partial Correlation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although not used as frequently, this method has been found to perform at a level comparable to or better than other methods (Valencia, Rankin, & Livingston, 1995;Willson, Nolan, Reynolds, & Kamphaus, 1989), Although this is not a perfect measure of item bias, its comparative superiority in performance relative to other methods, coupled with its ease of computation, makes it a method of choice for the applied researcher. Because no single method can identify item bias accurately, it is apt to heed Camilli and Shepard's (1994) recommendation that professional judgment involving poststatistical computations in an attempt to explain why a particular item functioned differently for a particular subgroup ought to be considered.…”
Section: Detecting Item Bias: the Partial Correlation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, each child was administered the Triangles subtest of the K-ABC (Kaufman & Kaufman, 1983). The Triangles subtest is a matching task that reportedly taps a fairly general nonverbal cognitive skill, is appropriate for children in this age range, and evidences no racial or cultural biases (Cole, Gay, Glick, & Sharp, 1971;Kaufman, 1973;Lampley & Rust, 1986;Palmer, Olivarez, Willson, & Fordyce, 1989;Willson, Nolan, Reynolds, & Kamphaus, 1989). Equivalencies on the cognitive task at Time 1 were examined by comparing the scaled scores on the Triangles subtest.…”
Section: Assessment Of Nonverbal Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, each child was administered the Triangles subtest of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC; Kaufman & Kaufman, 1983). Triangles is a matching task that taps a fairly general cognitive skill, is appropriate for children in this age range, and evidences no racial or cultural biases (Cole, Gay, Glick, & Sharp, 1971;Kaufman, 1973;Lampley & Rust, 1986;Palmer, Olivarez, Willson, & Fordyce, 1989;Willson, Nolan, Reynolds, & Kamphaus, 1989). Each student achieved a scaled score of 7 or more, performance within one standard deviation (-3) of the mean (10).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%