2016
DOI: 10.3998/fc.13761232.0040.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race at the Interface: Rendering Blackness on WorldStarHipHop.com

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially important to note given debates about disembodiment and online sociality over the decades, and the implications for Black women, especially in that one cannot simply separate Black women's bodies from our practices online. 6 Considering these scholarly and historical perspectives, inDmix might also be read as a Black primitive space in the sense that it lacks the modernist or bourgeois aesthetic characteristic of digital whiteness (boyd, 2012;Cramer, 2016).…”
Section: Indmix's Intracommunity Gaze and Web 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is especially important to note given debates about disembodiment and online sociality over the decades, and the implications for Black women, especially in that one cannot simply separate Black women's bodies from our practices online. 6 Considering these scholarly and historical perspectives, inDmix might also be read as a Black primitive space in the sense that it lacks the modernist or bourgeois aesthetic characteristic of digital whiteness (boyd, 2012;Cramer, 2016).…”
Section: Indmix's Intracommunity Gaze and Web 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. not bounded by phenotype or figurai representation” (Cramer, 2016, p. 2). Informed by Black feminist approaches to visual culture, I examine inDmix’s web interface as racialized gender discourse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nelson 2002;Nakamura 2007). This separation renders online spaces "free" from marked difference and therefore neutral platforms for social life (as I argue in Kraemer 2021; see also Gillespie 2010;Cramer 2016).…”
Section: Gender Of/as Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She asks instead who are the objects of interactivity, emphasizing that the boundaries between objects and subjects are not fixed: "Women and people of color are both subjects and objects of interactivity; they participate in digital racial formation via acts of technological appropriation, yet are subjected to it as well" (2007,16). Lauren Cramer (2016) further analyzes nonrepresentational processes of racial formation through interface design, in which Blackness operates through spatial ordering of a hip-hop video website rather than figural representation of Black bodies. Despite allegedly neutral website design, adapted from principles of Modernist architecture, Blackness materializes and becomes shareable through a coherent visual style that renders "blackness in the disembodied space of the Internet" (Cramer 2016, 16).…”
Section: Gender Of/as Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation