1999
DOI: 10.1177/0895904899131007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race, Class, and Gender in Education Research: Surveying the Political Terrain

Abstract: This article explores the issues of race and prejudice that permeate research. It does so by examining two aspects of educational research on race: conceptual shifts about issues of race, class, and gender, and the politics of citation. Newer, alternative research paradigms help free researchers from the racist, sexist, and class baggage from the traditional, positivist approach. The article concludes with suggestions on how researchers can “right the wrong” of past and current education research on race.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Foster (1999) identifies a number of historical and social reasons for this limitation, including the dominance of White university researchers and the marginalization of alternative discourses of education. In a discussion on disengaging from the legacy of the White archetype of "Lady Bountiful" in teacher education classrooms, Meiners (2002) describes the "barriers, complications and consequences" of asking student teachers to consider their perspectives and selfconstructions of Lady Bountiful (p. 86).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Foster (1999) identifies a number of historical and social reasons for this limitation, including the dominance of White university researchers and the marginalization of alternative discourses of education. In a discussion on disengaging from the legacy of the White archetype of "Lady Bountiful" in teacher education classrooms, Meiners (2002) describes the "barriers, complications and consequences" of asking student teachers to consider their perspectives and selfconstructions of Lady Bountiful (p. 86).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…• Achievement gap explanations can frame White students as the norm from which other racial and ethnic groups of students are to be compared (Foster, 1999). 2 White students can be covertly and tacitly constructed as intellectually and academically superior to others.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, race matters in curriculum development and enactment. Sadly, teachers can sometimes design curriculum and instructional practices, which are grounded in a "White norm" (Foster, 1999) that students of color simply have to accept or just deal with because they may not have the power to counter what is emphasized. Curriculum and instructional practices matter (Eisner, 1994;McCutcheon, 2002) and can make a meaningful difference in how students in urban classrooms experience education.…”
Section: Curriculum and Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%