Race Matters? Examining and Rethinking Race Portrayal in Preclinical Medical Education

Abstract

Critical examination of "health disparities" is gaining consideration in medical schools across the United States, often as elective curricula that supplement required education. However, there is disconnect between discussions of race and disparities in these curricula and in core science courses. Specifically, required preclinical science lecturers often operationalize race as a biological concept, framing racialized disparities as inherent in bodies. A three- and five-month sampling of lecture slides at the authors' medical school demonstrated that race was almost always presented as a biological risk factor.This presentation of race as an essential component of epidemiology, risk, diagnosis, and treatment without social context is problematic, as a broad body of literature supports that race is not a robust biological category. The authors opine that current preclinical medical curricula inaccurately employ race as a definitive medical category without context, which may perpetuate misunderstanding of race as a bioscientific datum, increase bias among student-doctors, and ultimately contribute to worse patient outcomes.At the authors' institution, students approached the medical school administration with a letter addressing the current use of race, urging reform. The administration was receptive to proposals for further analysis of race in medical education and created a taskforce to examine curricular reform. Curricular changes were made as part of the construction of a longitudinal race-in-medicine curriculum. The authors seek to use their initiatives and this article to spark critical discussion on how to use teaching of race to work against racial inequality in health care.

Is research on professional identity formation biased? Early insights from a scoping review and metasynthesis

“…This happens in medicine too. To take just one example, spirometry value calculators, which measure lung function, sometimes include ‘race corrections’ because in 1864 a large study concluded that white soldiers had higher lung capacity than black soldiers and yet there is no modern evidence that lung function varies based on the colour of one's skin.…”

Mental health care among blacks in America: Confronting racism and constructing solutions

“…While some medical schools have courses on racial disparities in health, critical race theory to help contextualize racial health disparities is not a requirement. In fact, in most medical school curricula, race is framed as biological or as a biological risk factor, implying that racial disparities in health are innate and can be explained without implicating racism . This fosters pathologizing race rather than racism, whereas racism is the risk factor.…”

“…In fact, in most medical school curricula, race is framed as biological or as a biological risk factor, implying that racial disparities in health are innate and can be explained without implicating racism. [30][31][32][33] This fosters pathologizing race rather than racism, whereas racism is the risk factor. Naming racism in medical education, health services research and policy, and how it is distinct from race as a category can advance efforts to reduce racial health inequities.…”

Race and Health: Dilemmas of the South African health researcher

“…This may have important social consequences, and not just for research. For example, Tsai et al 6 reported that race was used as an unexplained, definitive category in the teaching of medical students in the USA, and that essentialist and misleading ideas about race were being reproduced through this education. The same is true of the training of health professionals in many other countries.…”