1974
DOI: 10.2307/1227685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race, Racism, and American Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
145
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
145
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Acknowledging that curriculum as "master script" is inherently biased gives credence to The reason why inclusion is important is that exclusion only serves the underdevelopment of those populations pushed to the margins (Bell, 1973Marable, 2002McIntosh, 1998).…”
Section: Belief 2: Statistic and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Acknowledging that curriculum as "master script" is inherently biased gives credence to The reason why inclusion is important is that exclusion only serves the underdevelopment of those populations pushed to the margins (Bell, 1973Marable, 2002McIntosh, 1998).…”
Section: Belief 2: Statistic and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…perspective, racism is viewed as being ubiquitous in American society to such an extent that it permeates all aspects of diverse people's lives and experiences (Bell, 1973). As a result, it is not surprising that our culturally diverse learners underachieve; live in neighborhoods steeped in poverty and attend some of our nation's poorest K-12 schools.…”
Section: Interplay Of Critical Race Theory Tenets and Culturally Respmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meaningful equality cannot be achieved without addressing these effects (Bell, 2000). This concept is an important concept for addressing the "Sufficient Education" clause in the New Mexico State Constitution.…”
Section: Sufficient Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 While Edmunds did make the tactical mistakes of not appealing Blodgett and not discussing lower court decisions, it seems very unlikely that these errors determined the result, for his brief presented the essential inequity and unconstitutionality of the situation clearly and in sufficient detail for the Court, acting within the relatively loose constraints of equity principles, to have decided in his clients' favor had it so desired.…”
Section: The Journal Of Southern Historymentioning
confidence: 99%